Hi Jim,
Am 15.09.20 um 13:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and
> AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull
> those Issues into AOO418.
It got reverted here (and in some other commits):
https://g
Because there where claims it should be tested first. And no one ever
signed the changes off.
At least I did see it this way.
Am 19.09.20 um 01:54 schrieb GitBox:
DonLewisFreeBSD commented on pull request #83:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/83#issuecomment-695131653
Yes,
leginee commented on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-695195811
A good test is after apply that the Font still works as expected. The patch
first was a quick and dirty fix, and this should be the proper one.
-
Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, and
at least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick to the
old code for long time it will make maintenance or development more
difficuilt.
Am 17.09.20 um 23:57 schrieb Marcus:
Am 17.09.20 um 21:15 schrieb Da
+1
Am 16.09.20 um 20:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
I am very interested in the outcome...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 10.09.20 um 18:48 schrieb Griselda Cuevas:
Dear PMC,
I’m contacting you because your project has been selected by the ASF D&I
committee which is leading a research proj
Hi Yury
Am 15.09.20 um 19:40 schrieb Yury Tarasievich:
Hello all
What is the progress on scons-build project?
And you'd need to be a programmer to help speed
it up, I suppose?
yes. Damjan has done qwuite an extensive update I had not the muse to
test out yet.
However, what needs to be don
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #98:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/98#issuecomment-695204529
I think this should be applied to all branches.
Maybe later we can move to junit-4.13.jar?
This is an a
Hi Jim,
Am 15.09.20 um 13:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are we ready for us to start coordinating an AOO418 release in earnest?
>
> Do we need a RM? If so, I can volunteer...
I think we have a release manager now? ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
> -
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #98:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/98
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
ardovm commented on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-695215925
> A good test is after apply that the Font still works as expected. The
patch first was a quick and dirty fix, and this should be the proper one.
Are there any automated tes
ardovm commented on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-695216559
I forgot to mention that while developing this PR, I made some mistakes that
produced _invalid output_ with no crashes. The PDF was wrong (garbled
characters) but no error message
pedlino commented on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-695216940
> > A good test is after apply that the Font still works as expected. The
patch first was a quick and dirty fix, and this should be the proper one.
>
> Are there any automa
pedlino edited a comment on pull request #89:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/89#issuecomment-695216940
> I am feeling a bit stupid while typing this, like I am reinventing the
wheel using the wrong tools, but please understand I am only trying to help.
Never feel stup
13 matches
Mail list logo