Re: ooowiki continuation (was: Re: OpenOffice)

2017-05-09 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello Jörg, I personally believe that the certificate policy is common business phrasing. I think it is a good business style to talk positively or not at all of organisations. You never know what relation ship these people are in. And worse thing that can happen is that you damage your own renown

Re: ooowiki continuation

2017-05-09 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > If openoffice.info wants to be a stakeholder, we can certainly include > > you (or other reps) in the technical discussions. > > No thanks. de.openoffice.info is an independent forum. > Then I don't get what you're asking for - either you want to be part of a solution, whi

ooowiki continuation (was: Re: OpenOffice)

2017-05-09 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jörg Schmidt wrote: > I personally requested some cooperation of LO about www.ooowiki.de, > the reaction at LO was zero, see: > https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/de/discuss/msg20541.html > Hi Jörg, I think at the time of your posting, that topic was somewhat on hold/stalled. Being 2 months late

Re: ooowiki continuation (was: Re: OpenOffice)

2017-05-09 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com] > > Maybe I would also like to be a participant in the > LibreOffice Certification > > Program, but I am a free spirit and prerequisites such as a) in: > > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/assets/Certification/tdf-cer > tification

Re: ooowiki continuation

2017-05-09 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Thorsten Behrens [mailto:t...@libreoffice.org] > Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > > If openoffice.info wants to be a stakeholder, we can > certainly include > > > you (or other reps) in the technical discussions. > > > > No thanks. de.openoffice.info is an independent forum. > > > Then I don't