The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same
as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority
of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distinction
between being a source-only project and "source-only-but-we-also-provide-
community-builds"
Exactly.
It seems just a distraction to me, unless I've missed hidden or untold
bonus points.
R
2017-05-02 13:11 GMT+02:00 Jim Jagielski :
> The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same
> as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority
> of AOO users h
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Raphael,
>
> Thank you for your effort!
> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a
> 4.1.4 RC.
>
> May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/
I have 2 CentOS5 VMs setup, one 32bit the other 64. Is anyone else on task
for doing 4.1.4 build for these platforms or should I give it a go?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM.
I've updated the wiki build page
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step)
with some updates, most due to CentOS5 is now EOL and some urls
have changed. Plus, I needed to manually install File::Path
> On May 2, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341
>> (Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release)
>>
>
> +1 as well...
>
> r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216
>
Backported to 4.1.4...
--
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same
> as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority
> of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distinction
> between being a source-only proj
On 5/2/2017 8:42 AM, Jorg Schmidt wrote:
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same
as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority
of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distincti
Went OK... Will now kick off a x32 build...
These are test builds, since we still have 2 backports pending::
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Raphael,
>
> Thank you for your effort!
> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a
> 4.
Hi Jim,
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24
We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll
(32bit) for the windows build.
(see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt)
Regards, Matthias
P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits
> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24
>
> We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll
> (32bit) for the windows build.
> (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt)
Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24
>>
>> We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll
>> (32bit) for the windows build.
>> (see: .
Since I'm not doing a Windows build, I assume we don't need to install
it and have it part of the SVN tag??
> On May 2, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
Am 02.05.2017 um 22:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Since I'm not doing a Windows build, I assume we don't need to install
> it and have it part of the SVN tag??
I am not so familiar with the procedure, but that sounds reasonable.
So whoever does the Windows builds has to make sure to include
msvcr10
Jim Jagielski wrote:
FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM.
My CentOS 64 builds are online and confirmed to be working by others who
use it for daily tasks (see archives of this list, or just ask if you
need a link). Unless you see a reason for making alternate ones, I think
Andrea Pescetti has granted Matthias Seidel
's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127341: Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Pescetti ---
Merged by jim to the AOO414 branch for OpenOffice 4.1.4 wit
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 2, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341
(Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release)
+1 as well...
r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216
Backported to 4.1.4...
It seems the Bugzilla bot was confused and d
Am 02.05.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> Thank you for your effort!
>> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a
>> 4.1.4 RC.
>>
>> May I suggest that these "release blocker" sh
Am 02.05.2017 um 23:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 02.05.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
If we decide to get the new ASF logos for the installer, we should also
update the setup icons for Windows/macOS and the Intro/About Dialog. But
th
I tried to build OpenOffice from svn's AOO413 tag today, this time
successful.
Still i have to say that the wiki page with step-by-step guide has some
errors that i had to deal with(or it's outdated a bit).
Things that I encountered so far:
1. Suggested ./configure option list in the wiki is miss
20 matches
Mail list logo
