Hello,
I have translated the release notes in German and I get the following idea:
We need an press release on AOO 4.1.3, because:
- to counter the existing rumors to AOO
- To say something to 4.1.3 (this version was also meant to rearrange internal
processes in the project, which should be ex
Am 10/09/2016 09:32 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
I have translated the release notes in German and I get the following idea:
We need an press release on AOO 4.1.3, because:
- to counter the existing rumors to AOO
- To say something to 4.1.3 (this version was also meant to rearrange internal
proc
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> I working already with Apache for a press release.
Thank you, these are good news.
Please let me know if I can help with a German translation of the press
release, because public relations is, in this times, important for Germany.
You (Marcis) kn
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
> You (Marcis) ...
Sorry, I meant:
You (Marcus) ...
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffi
Hi,
Don't know if you had some help usually for the French translation but if
needed, I can help.
However, I've no access to the French area of the website, it would have to be
posted online by someone who has the karma.
Hagar
Le 09/10/2016 à 10:44, Jörg Schmidt a écrit :
From: Marcus [mail
+1 for press release +1 for translation.
Jörg Schmidt schrieb am So., 9. Okt. 2016, 10:48:
> > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
>
> > You (Marcis) ...
>
> Sorry, I meant:
>
> You (Marcus) ...
>
>
> Jörg
>
>
> -
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be
> coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on
> it. So I'd like to have an AOO414 branch where (once they are approved) we
> c
Yes I agree signing the package for our users would be a good step, while
the app store is the next step in this topic.
Matthias Seidel schrieb am So., 9. Okt. 2016,
00:41:
> +1
>
> Maybe this would be something for long-term?
>
> But what about getting a Developer ID from Apple to get rid of th
On 10/9/2016 5:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be
coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on
it. So I'd like to have an AOO
On 10/5/2016 8:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and
adding anything missing.
Just in case anyone missed it, the vote passed so it is time to execute
the post
Am 10/09/2016 02:31 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/9/2016 5:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3
will be
coming in a week or so and for sure there is no furth
Am 10/09/2016 03:28 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/5/2016 8:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and
adding anything missing.
Just in case anyone missed it,
Peter Kovacs wrote:
Yes I agree signing the package for our users would be a good step, while
the app store is the next step in this topic.
For some literature on the ASF and the App Store you can read this long
discussion from a few months ago:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-111
I will happiliy test the 414 branch when it is available.
Will there be build bots?
Matthias
Am 07.10.2016 um 01:15 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10/06/2016 11:55 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Yes, there were at least 5 (overlapping) issues solved by these 2 fixes.
>>
>> Should they all be requested a
We should ensure that AOO people join the keysignings @ ApacheCon
> On Oct 8, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> This is not a blocker for the release (and moreover signature files are
> explicitly allowed to be updated during the release vote if needed), but I
> couldn't verify signa
Thanks for the insight.
On 09.10.2016 17:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So this is not impossible, but probably a prerequisite will be to sign
MacOS X packages with a signature that Apple (to be precise,
Gatekeeper) recognizes as valid. I have no idea on what this entails.
The ASF has a signing s
Hello all,
I have some Problems in understanding the Concept of the code.
Especially the not obvious parts are difficult.
So What I have read are some architectur overview Documentation on
OpenOffice wiki. Also on the same ressource some uno Documentation.
I am currently focusing into und
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1
Am 10/09/2016 07:52 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of
https://di
+1 to proceed with NEXT STEP™ towards getting AOO signed for Gatekeeper.
Peter, don’t get yourself lost in historic discussions and perhaps
unwillingness to tackle this. Some developers have been satisfied with the
status quo since we have a workaround (an awful one).
So please, if you can bring
Peter Kovacs wrote:
I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist
involved?
Oh, sure! You can search for digital signatures on the dev list
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@openoffice.apache.org (I recall I
sent a message on 1st January 2015, and nothing significant
On 10/09/2016 Mark Thomas wrote:
On 9 September 2016 23:29:49 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
The infrastructure team has regained access to the OpenOffice code
signing account. If you would like to use it to sign releases please
open an infra ticket and provide the Apache IDs
M
Marcus wrote:
Can you upload in a staged dir? Have you tried this already in
the past?
No, I haven't, and I probably made the wrong choice. I created the
"4.1.3" directory through the web interface and I was asked whether to
consider it staged or not, I went for "not staged" but I don't see a
Am 10/09/2016 09:42 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Can you upload in a staged dir? Have you tried this already in
the past?
No, I haven't, and I probably made the wrong choice. I created the
"4.1.3" directory through the web interface and I was asked whether to
consider it staged o
On 09.10.2016 20:54, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Peter, don’t get yourself lost in historic discussions and perhaps
unwillingness to tackle this. Some developers have been satisfied with the
status quo since we have a workaround (an awful one).
No not want to get lost. But it is good to know what was al
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So upload is in progress and at a very good speed
Upload is complete. So all binaries are now available from SourceForge,
even though I assume that for best download speed one should still wait
for some hours while all mirrors are populated.
I confirm that uploading t
Am 10/09/2016 11:00 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So upload is in progress and at a very good speed
Upload is complete. So all binaries are now available from SourceForge,
even though I assume that for best download speed one should still wait
for some hours while all mir
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of
https://dis
On 9 Oct, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Marcus wrote:
>>> - Change the RC1 into the real release
>>
>> This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
>>
>>> - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
>>
>> This one takes a few ho
On 10/9/2016 8:56 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 9 Oct, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This
On 9 October 2016 20:21:32 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>On 10/09/2016 Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 9 September 2016 23:29:49 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
The infrastructure team has regained access to the OpenOffice code
signing account. If you would like to use it to s
On 08/10/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
(secondary resource) at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/
... doesn't contain mine since I never bothered uploading it again
My key is now listed on the secondary resource too, just for extra
visibility. If others want to do the same, they must simp
It is no longer possible to reinstall/repair a 4.1.3 installation under
Window without uninstalling first.
Not a release blocker for 4.1.4 but definitely a fix worth considering.
--
Please address any reply to the mailing list only. Any messages sent to
this noreply@ address are automatically del
33 matches
Mail list logo
