On 09.10.2016 20:54, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Peter, don’t get yourself lost in historic discussions and perhaps
unwillingness to tackle this. Some developers have been satisfied with the
status quo since we have a workaround (an awful one).
No not want to get lost. But it is good to know what was already on the
table. Then I know what to ask in order to avoid missasumptions.
On 09.10.2016 21:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Peter Kovacs wrote:
I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist
involved?
Oh, sure! You can search for digital signatures on the dev list
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@openoffice.apache.org (I recall
I sent a message on 1st January 2015, and nothing significant happened
after it except discussions).
Thanks!
Absolutely. Actually less than that is enough. I mean, if Infra is
going to be involved then we mustn't repeat once again -and I am
responsible for at least one occurrence- the mistake of asking to
prepare stuff and not using it.
Then Consider me in. It is something that I can fairly easy do. If you
help me a bit.
Let's start from the basics. I'll now reopen a conversation here
asking if the Symantec signing infrastructure applies to Gatekeeper or
not. If it is Windows-only, then the entire previous discussions are
not relevant and we (you) must find a way forward for Mac OS X. If, on
the contrary, it applies, then I'll give you explanations and liaise
with Infra since you might not have the needed level of access.
Hmm, I have nothing. Well except Bugzilla of course.
And Jörg said there needs to be of an introduction of sort? This
beaucracy is not high n my priority list. :)
However I will need some help here and there. But I am confident I get
the support from someone.
All the best
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
