Am 09/15/2015 07:44 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
A user of the German mailing list (users...@openoffice.apache.org) asking for
deletion of their emails [1]. Is this possible? If so, who can do practically?
you can point her to this webpage [1]. It depends on the arguments if a
removal is possibl
Am 09/14/2015 11:31 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
Right now our SNAPSHOT tag, which is used by the buildbots
is set at r1614269. Should this be changed to r1698423 when Andrea
changed the version number to 4.1.2?
IMHO yes. There were already a good number of committs (in both
branches). So, it makes
The best case we can make is a new release. So, even for this little
change it's good to make progress with 4.1.2.
PS:
I've my own opinion about Wikipedia and it's data quality. Maybe you can
guess in what direction is could go.
Marcus
Am 09/15/2015 12:14 AM, schrieb John D'Orazio:
Yes I
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> you can point her to this webpage [1]. It depends on the
> arguments if a
> removal is possible.
>
> If it's already mirrored in the Internet,
True, on this issue I had not thought.
> then it's
> up to the admins of these servers if they delet
Hello!
Try the followings to update:
http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/frame/DocumentTemplates.html
http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/frame/XDocumentTemplates.html#update
Thank you very much! This is what I was searching for.
Regards, Mathias
Hello!
I read
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=63814&p=290135#p290135
again and again. But I can't find the answer if and how it is possible
to provide only one extension where toolbars will work with AOO and LO.
And if I have to provide two extensions: how can I decl
I answer again to myself. ;-)
I read
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=63814&p=290135#p290135
again and again. But I can't find the answer if and how it is possible
to provide only one extension where toolbars will work with AOO and LO.
After thinking a long time about
Correction, there was some nodes too much:
Now I have in the Addons.xcu:
... Old Scheme ...
Toolbar Title
... New AOO 4.x Scheme ...
With the files and entries for all ...WindowsState.xcu it works for AOO
and LO
Hi,
> Right now our SNAPSHOT tag, which is used by the buildbots
> is set at r1614269. Should this be changed to r1698423 when Andrea
> changed the version number to 4.1.2?
my latest commit on AOO410 branch is 1702993
--
Bye,
Yuri Dario
Hi
I've contributed an accessibility related patch to LibreOffice which I'd
like to see included in Apache OpenOffice.
How do I best go about doing that. I do not mind relicensing the patch
(as I understand it that should be possible
right?). However I'm not sure how to contribute to OpenOffice
On 09/15/2015 09:20 AM, Yuri Dario wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Right now our SNAPSHOT tag, which is used by the buildbots
>> is set at r1614269. Should this be changed to r1698423 when Andrea
>> changed the version number to 4.1.2?
>
> my latest commit on AOO410 branch is 1702993
OK. I guess we wait.
Hi Mathias,
I can't find any explanation for a difference for the
node in description.xml. It seems AOO and LO tests always against the
same entries.
please see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Extension_Development for lo:
http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006";
Am 09/15/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Niklas Johansson:
I've contributed an accessibility related patch to LibreOffice which I'd
like to see included in Apache OpenOffice.
that's great. We appreciate every new code contribution.
How do I best go about doing that. I do not mind relicensing the patch
Hi,
I have added l:LibreOffice-minimal-version to my extension's
deescription.xml file.
But I got error while installing the package to Apache OpenOffice 4.
On the current version, you can not put it into an extension that targets
AOO.
Regards
2015-09-16 1:51 GMT+09:00 Oliver Brinzing :
> Hi Ma
Hi Niklas
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Niklas Johansson
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've contributed an accessibility related patch to LibreOffice which I'd
> like to see included in Apache OpenOffice.
Thank you so much for this!
> How do I best go about doing that. I do not mind relicensing the patch
in LO the higest "working version is limited to "3.0" so its a bug
On 15/09/2015 19:23, Tsutomu Uchino wrote:
Hi,
I have added l:LibreOffice-minimal-version to my extension's
deescription.xml file.
But I got error while installing the package to Apache OpenOffice 4.
On the current version, you c
"Moribund" is a goofy word that almost nobody uses in conversation, but
it's probably more accurate than "dormant". I've spent enough time
goofing around on Wikipedia lately, so, for myself, I'm quite happy to
leave it as is, until the 4.1.2 release comes out. At that point, I think
it's clear t
"Moribund" means "dying". It's a goofy word, yes, which means it's an
attention-getting word, which means people will look at it and say, "What
the hell does THAT mean?" and focus on why someone would call AOO that.
Is "dying" more accurate than "dormant" to describe AOO? "Dying" suggests
the pr
Fair enough. That is the dictionary definition. I was thinking of how
it's used colloquially, which seems
to be more like a synonym for "stagnant." I'd be OK with either
"stagnant" or "stalled", if the change
can be made without someone immediately reverting it. I probably won't do
it myself
Hi Marcus
Den 2015-09-15 kl. 19:20, skrev Marcus:
I would recommend a new entry in our issue tracker [1], so that the
issue is documented. Then you can add the patch as file and state that
you put the patch under ALv2.
If it's really only 2 lines, then IMHO it should be easy that other
devs
Well actually the case of the wikipedia article is different, because the
adjective that is used for the project whether "dormant" or "moribund" is
not in fact actually being referred to the Apache project but to the
pre-Apache project. The Apache project is indicated as being a derivative
project
On 2015-09-15, 5:17 PM John D'Orazio wrote:
Well actually the case of the wikipedia article is different, because the
adjective that is used for the project whether "dormant" or "moribund" is
not in fact actually being referred to the Apache project but to the
pre-Apache project.
No. It is Apa
A set of initial, raw tests was provided for review, clarification, and
updating at the ODF Plugfest that started today in The Netherlands.
I asked permission to share this information, at the end, below, with the
Apache OpenOffice developers list, with the following observations:
"I am more
23 matches
Mail list logo
