in LO the higest "working version is limited to "3.0" so its a bug
On 15/09/2015 19:23, Tsutomu Uchino wrote:
Hi,
I have added l:LibreOffice-minimal-version to my extension's
deescription.xml file.
But I got error while installing the package to Apache OpenOffice 4.
On the current version, you can not put it into an extension that targets
AOO.
Regards
2015-09-16 1:51 GMT+09:00 Oliver Brinzing <oliver.brinz...@gmx.de>:
Hi Mathias,
I can't find any explanation for a difference for the <dependencies>
node in description.xml. It seems AOO and LO tests always against the
same entries.
please see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Extension_Development for
lo:
<description xmlns="http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006"
xmlns:l="http://libreoffice.org/extensions/description/2011"
xmlns:d="
http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<dependencies>
<l:LibreOffice-minimal-version value="4.0" d:name="LibreOffice 4.0"/>
</dependencies
aoo is a bit different:
<description xmlns="http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006"
xmlns:l="http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006"
xmlns:d="
http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<dependencies>
<l:OpenOffice.org-minimal-version value="4.0" d:name="OpenOffice.org
4.0"/>
</dependencies>
Regards
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org