Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 08/12/2014 jan i wrote: > >> So may I politely ask, what have changed, that we now believe this will >> all >> go away, and we can have it all solved in a short time ? >> > > Not much has changed indeed. I pushed to have buildbots runnin

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote: On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Very honestly, I would like that we don't depend on individuals for project resources, but maybe it is easier for a developer to share an existing virtual machine (and possibly get it running at Apache) than to pre

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

On 10/12/2014 21:09, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: On 10 Dec2014, at 15:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Note that FOSDEM talks have a requirement to be technical. ... Right; but at the same time, there are other options besides talks Sure. This only holds for talks in devrooms, as I just confirmed with

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

On Sunday, December 14, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 10/12/2014 21:09, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 10 Dec2014, at 15:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Note that FOSDEM talks have a requirement to be technical. ... >>> >> Right; but at the same time, there are other options besides talks >

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

Hello Am 14.12.2014 um 16:57 schrieb jan i: > On Sunday, December 14, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 10/12/2014 21:09, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >>> On 10 Dec2014, at 15:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > We (AOO) have done enough of explaining who we are, now > its high time to start showi

Re: Open Document Editors Devroom at FOSDEM 15, Brussels, 31 Jan 2015

jan i wrote: On Sunday, December 14, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Obviously, I'm very open to both technical and non-technical discussions at any moment during FOSDEM; ... these are the house rules, but for the rest we'll be free to discuss everything! I expect to be there Saturday afternoon, w

buildbot notification issues, output page, etc

* We seem to again have lost notification from from buildbot on our builds. * The buildbot page for OpenOffice currently has some issues -- see : http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ even though the buildbots have run Before I contact infra, does anyone know anything about this? -- ---

Re: CentOS build box.

On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote: That is due to the simple fact that this vm is not in ldap nor does it run puppet, These are not mandatory (only makes life easier). OK, so where do I login? I mean, I assume there is an account "pescetti" on that machine and that my SSH key has been copied to it (ba

Deflecting the Attack of the Clones

I have been watching the arrival of support requests for AOO knock-offs on Android and plain-old PCs with some dismay. Some of this damage is self-inflicted: The Apache OpenOffice source code compiles to binaries that describes themselves and support structures as offered by Apache OpenOffice.

RE: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)

Correction: " The RAT scan linked to in the [VOTE] message for 4.1.1 lists only seven files for aoo410/main/writerperfect." (not aoo401) -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 17:00 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Su

Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)

On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at

Re: Java 32

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > > On 12/12/2014 06:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> On 12/11/2014 12:37 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >>> Am 12/11/2014 04:58 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >>> +1 to Andreas. Sounds like a plan. There seems to be some disagreement on

RE: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)

I agree. If the build doesn't depend on them being there in some manner, simple removal of the writerperfect directory from the trunk should be sufficient. If there is a config dependency for creating builds, that should be removed as well. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Andrea Pe

Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)

Hello; > Il giorno 14/dic/2014, alle ore 17:20, Andrea Pescetti > ha scritto: > > On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> Looking at >> aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first >> one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL >> license notic