On 07/10/2014 Kay Schenk wrote:
Your patch has now been committed to trunk and noted in the issue. Good
job! Please feel free to continue your work with us either in the Help
area or elsewhere.
Thanks Zimuzo for your first patch! Two things, one for Zimuzo and one
generic:
1) Zimuzo, if you
Am 23.10.2014 um 06:47 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>
> I think it's good that we live in a free society and customers have the right
> to
> see things differently.
>
Being a customer, I do see things differently. Every OOXML file is a
vote against ODF. One day in future LO will save ODF as a seconda
On 23.10.2014 01:08, Kay Schenk wrote:
I know the crash reporter was disabled sometime before March, 2012.
But can someone provide the commit message on this?
As far as I know there was no explicit commit for this. Enabling or
disabling the crash reporter was a configuration option
(--enable
Two thoughts:
1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
on SUN and later Oracle.
So the situation under the "roof" of the Apache Software Foundation is a
real progress. So we shouldn't complain that IBM doesn't try to dominate
our project by creating new dependencies,
On 23/10/14 07:02, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:13 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Improved OOXML support?
>>
>> With regard to the quotation from me, yes, it is possible to
>> find
Hi Keith,
Keith N. McKenna schrieb:
I just tried to log in to my cwiki account for the first time since I
switched to seamonkey from Firefox as my default browser and I am unable
to log in. I still have Firefox installed and am able to log in with it.
Is anyone else using seamonkey and having tr
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> Two thoughts:
>
> 1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
> on SUN and later Oracle.
>
> So the situation under the "roof" of the Apache Software Foundation is a
> real progress. So we shouldn't complain that IBM
Hi,
find a color table in https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Regina/MYDrafts6
Kind regards
Regina
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.or
> On 2014-10 -23, at 07:36, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
>> Two thoughts:
>>
>> 1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
>> on SUN and later Oracle.
>>
>> So the situation under the "roof" of the Apache Software Founda
This problem has indirectly to do with the lack of marketing efforts the
community has been victim off.
Without going into further rant, there should be some attention being put
to what the project is communicating right now.
On Oct 23, 2014 6:37 AM, "Rob Weir" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2) Fixes for any critical bugs, especially any introduced in AOO
4.1.1. Do we know ye
For #3, it's a good idea.
If you want any help, i'm volonteer
See you
Sylvain DENIS
AOO Belgium
Le 23/10/14 18:16, Rob Weir a écrit :
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language upd
s inline
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 23:21
To: d...@community.apache.org
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Extras PoC
On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote:
> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have
+1
I think a 4.1.2 would also be a good mentoring/training process for an
additional Release Manager or two.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 09:16
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2
A short
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Is the intention to not make these particularly visible and have
the SF locations just provide a kind of private parking lot for the
AOO project?
The way we have used Apache Extras so far, indeed, is as a mere file
repository (which is exactly the usage
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
>
> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
>
> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
> course dictionary updates.
>
> 2) Fixes for any criti
Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Keith N. McKenna schrieb:
>> I just tried to log in to my cwiki account for the first time since I
>> switched to seamonkey from Firefox as my default browser and I am unable
>> to log in. I still have Firefox installed and am able to log in with it.
>> Is an
Am 10/23/2014 01:36 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
Two thoughts:
1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
on SUN and later Oracle.
So the situation under the "roof" of the Apache Software Foundation is a
real progress.
On 10/23/2014 04:36 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
>> Two thoughts:
>>
>> 1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
>> on SUN and later Oracle.
>>
>> So the situation under the "roof" of the Apache Software Foundation is a
On 10/23/2014 12:40 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 23.10.2014 01:08, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> I know the crash reporter was disabled sometime before March, 2012.
>>
>> But can someone provide the commit message on this?
>
> As far as I know there was no explicit commit for this. Enabling or
> disabli
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Your patch has now been committed to trunk and noted in the issue. Good
>> job! Please feel free to continue your work with us either in the Help
>> area or elsewhere.
>>
>
> Thanks Zimuzo for your fi
Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
2) All: Do we have a "canonical" way to attribute commits? ...
What we have documented is on:
http://openoffice.apache.org/svn-basics.html#committing_changes_by_others
I had not been including the email addresses -- oops
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 23.10.2014 01:08, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >I know the crash reporter was disabled sometime before March, 2012.
> >
> >But can someone provide the commit message on this?
>
> As far as I know there was no explicit commit for this. Enab
Hi all,
I have some question about installing OO‘ sdk. I know that this topic is
might not be appropriate for discussing at here. But I can't subscribe to
the a...@openoffice.apache.org, It always return me the message like below
at the step I confirm my mail address.
Delivery to the following rec
Hello,
> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
> Being a customer, I do see things differently.
> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
> One day in future LO will save ODF as a secondary
> option.
Possible.
But where is the problem?
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> no it means the benefit of the patches is so minimal that a rewrite is
> probably cheaper and easier. For the example for 1 use case we have
> integrated we spend a lot of time to understand the patch and realize
> that the implementation ad
26 matches
Mail list logo
