Hi,
Thank you for gread features.
When I added new release as "Host on this site", it got wrong version
number of the package [1].
The package contains but 4.0 is shown.
It seems minimal-version was used for the package version.
[1]
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/projectrelease/m
Rainer Bielefeld has asked for
4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 122733: Opening Hybrid PDF document fails, brings up ASCII filter options
dialog
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122733
--- Additional Comments from Rainer Bielefeld
Reproducible with "AOO 4.0.0-Dev – German UI / Germ
Am 07/13/2013 01:45 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
It is even possible to do it on the committer-only CWiki. (Anyone
remember that we have that?)
Yes, and we should simply delete this as it is no long used and need.
Technically it's of course possible to put the release notes there. But
we shouldn
Am 07/13/2013 01:28 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, "Marcus (OOo)" wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weirwrote:
In the past we dr
Am 07/13/2013 01:45 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, "Marcus (OOo)" wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weir wrote:
In the past w
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something on the Traditional Chinese version?
UI translation is not complete: https://translate.apache.org/zh_TW/aoo40/
I c
On 2013/07/13 18:20, Marcus (OOo) said:
> Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat
>> wrote:
>>> Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
>>> something on the Traditional Chinese version?
>>
>> UI translation is not
2013/7/13 imacat
> On 2013/07/13 18:20, Marcus (OOo) said:
> > Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat
> >> wrote:
> >>> Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
> >>> something on the Traditional Chinese version
2013/7/13 Roberto Galoppini
> 2013/7/9 Roberto Galoppini
>
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/7/8 Rob Weir
> >
> >> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Roberto Galoppini
> >> wrote:
> >> > We are updating http://extensions.openoffice.org to tturn on all
> >> > enhancements previously made available at the test
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat wrote:
> >>Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
> >>something on the Traditional Chinese version?
> >
> >UI
Am 07/13/2013 02:52 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
somethi
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:26:16AM +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> AOOE has been successfully migrated, below a concise list of improvements,
> a blog post on SF will follow next week (possibly coordinating that with
> the new AOO release).
>
> 1. The whole platform has been upgraded to a web 2
Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how that
went if you did.
Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
Thanks.
--
-
MzK
Success is falling ni
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, "Marcus (OOo)"
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Am
There was a bug when LO released the first version which collide with older
openoffice applications, they fix that on some versions ahead.
OpenOffice.org version by then was 3.4 RC which never really got released
officially. So I guess it will has to do with the LO version as well. LO
first version
2013/7/14 Kay Schenk
> Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how that
> went if you did.
>
> Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
>
That's highly distro dependant: on openSUSE both can live side by side
without problems, but AFAIK on *bun
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
> 2013/7/14 Kay Schenk
>
> > Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how
> that
> > went if you did.
> >
> > Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
> >
>
> That's highly distro dependant
On 2013/07/13 20:52, Ariel Constenla-Haile said:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
18 matches
Mail list logo
