New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
As you can see in http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwps/files/libwps/libwps-0.2.8/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpg/files/libwpg/libwpg-0.2.2/ the three libraries that OpenOffice was using to import WordPerfect, MS Works an

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > As you can see in > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/ > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwps/files/libwps/**libwps-0.2.8/

Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)

2013-04-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rob Weir wrote: In any case, will you next deal with our OpenGrok and Test link instances, which are at Adfinis domains Why not? It would make sense to recognize them as important community services and point opengrok.openoffice.org and testlink.openoffice.org to them. and of course our do

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On Apr 21, 2013 2:15 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > As you can see in > > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/< http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/> > > http://sourceforge.net/**

#122115 Mail merge wizard selecting records mixup records

2013-04-21 Thread Jean-Louis 'Hans' Fuchs
Hello I just reported this bug. Who will be assigned to this? I won't be able to solve this by myself, but I want to help. And since we need this as patch for 3.4.1 it's probably a good idea to discuss how the issue can be solved. OR there might be a workaround, which would be sufficent. Bes

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:25 AM, janI wrote: > On Apr 21, 2013 2:15 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti >wrote: > > > > > As you can see in > > > http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/< > http://sourceforge.net/projects/l

Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On Apr 21, 2013 3:26 PM, "Andrea Pescetti" wrote: > > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> In any case, will you next deal with our OpenGrok and Test link instances, >> which are at Adfinis domains > > > Why not? It would make sense to recognize them as important community services and point opengrok.openoffice.

RE: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed, . Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very specific restrictions. Having to build the code from source, especially with modifications, is problematic. - Dennis

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Licensing issues have not been entirely removed, > . > > Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very > specific restrictions. Having to build the code fr

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

2013-04-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 16/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains "archived" installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the a

HTML5 animation module for impress

2013-04-21 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Hi I wonder if an animation module for impress on HTML5 would be a good idea for GSoC. Something similar to Prezi, but on a more traditional Impress style. There is the CSS2 'screen' or presentation style which can get regular presentations and slide from one to the next. However a JS powered anima

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 16/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets > >Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains "ar

RE: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@Rob, Thanks. That is a great summary of what is involved. I am curious, in the case of libwpd, how binaries would be obtained and what the inclusion mechanism would be. E.g., would there be shared libraries/DLLs built from unmodified external sources as part of the AOO build? I assume un

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > @Rob, > > Thanks. > > That is a great summary of what is involved. > > I am curious, in the case of libwpd, how binaries would be obtained and > what the inclusion mechanism would be. E.g., would there be shared > libraries/DLLs built

RE: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@Rob, I'm sorry. I understood about there not being any presence in our source releases in any form whatever. I was looking only at stage (4, your number) and how inclusion in binary distributions occurs as a consequence of the build process. I am clear about the ASF Legal FAQ. I was asking

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell and libwpd? This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases since it was LGPL-only when OpenOffice 3.4.0 was released), but I expect this to be the case if libwpd is n

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On 21 April 2013 22:49, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell >> and libwpd? >> > > This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases > since it was LGPL-only when OpenOffice 3.4.0 w

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote: > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something. > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that uses > libwpd?). answer in https://i

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread janI
On 21 April 2013 23:55, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote: > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something. > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > > something else to replace it (or have we

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > @Rob, > > I'm sorry. I understood about there not being any presence in our source > releases in any form whatever. > > I was looking only at stage (4, your number) and how inclusion in binary > distributions occurs as a consequence of

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Jani, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > > > something. > > > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > > > something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that > > > u

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Jani, > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > > > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > > > > something. > > > > > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we

[Proposal]Improve Writer Table Header to Export Complete Info for Accessibility

2013-04-21 Thread chengjh
Currently, there is an accessibility issue for table header. If end users create Writer table and check the table header in the table dialog, the table header will have "Table Header" style and can be exported to pdf/doc completely,and Adobe Professional can recognize the table header correctly.Th

AOO 4.0 FVT(Sidebar Testing) weekly Report

2013-04-21 Thread Yi Xuan Liu
Hi, all By now, we have completed 71.65% sidebar test. 12 volunteers took part in sidebar test. 31 sidebar defects are opened to track sidebar issue. We're expected to complete sidebar test this Wednesday. More information of sidebar test is here

[CODE]: regression 3layer Windows setup

2013-04-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, I thought I tested very careful but it seems that I did not :-( I tested mainly the archives on windows because it's easier and faster and they worked well. I had tested the setup before and at this time it worked. Currently some former URE directories are not correct and the setup won't work

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

2013-04-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/22/13 12:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> Hi Jani, >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > something. > > If we

Re: HTML5 animation module for impress

2013-04-21 Thread Galileo Teco Juárez
how? a module, functioning in Impress, developed in HTML5? i did not understand the idea :D 2013/4/21 Alexandro Colorado > Hi I wonder if an animation module for impress on HTML5 would be a > good idea for GSoC. Something similar to Prezi, but on a more > traditional Impress style. There is t