Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

On 4/4/13 8:26 AM, janI wrote: > On 4 April 2013 06:19, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 um 22:46 schrieb Rob Weir: >>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >>> On 03/03/2013 janI wrote: > On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

Hi, On 03.04.2013 00:37, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Andrew Rist wrote: What version of CentOS do we want on this machine? We want the snapshot builds to be fully usable. I'll write here the reasoning behind this, so that it can be corrected if needed. Ariel's special version available at http://

Where are the eastereggs

Hello, Where are the eastereggs in OpenOffice.org (> 3.2.1) or Apache OpenOffice versions? Until version of OOo 3.2.1, there was eastereggs following: http://ooo42.de/ooo42-eastereggs.odt greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: Where are the eastereggs

On 4/4/13 10:28 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > > Where are the eastereggs in OpenOffice.org (> 3.2.1) or Apache OpenOffice > versions? > > Until version of OOo 3.2.1, there was eastereggs following: > http://ooo42.de/ooo42-eastereggs.odt > hopefully removed all but haven't checked this Ju

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

On 2/20/13 11:32 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 2/20/13 10:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we make good progress with the sidebar work which is done on the branch. >> The sidebar will be the most visible and important change for 4.0 (by >> the way I like what I have seen so far). We come

Re: Where are the eastereggs

Hello Jürgen, *, > From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] > hopefully removed all but haven't checked this What do you mean exactly? Future there will be no more eastereggs? OK, eastereggs are a gimmick, but at least "=Game("StarWars")" I found quite nice. greetings, Jörg No

Re : Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

Hi, Does some cycle exist about releasing of OOo? Because since the schedule, it seems that OOo 4.0 will not include current work about accessibility. It is a pitty as I think it is a major contribution and it would be a pitty if we should wait for end of 2014 to see it. It seems things could b

Re: Where are the eastereggs

On 4/4/13 11:18 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello Jürgen, *, > >> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] > >> hopefully removed all but haven't checked this > > What do you mean exactly? Future there will be no more eastereggs? > > OK, eastereggs are a gimmick, but at least "=Game(

Re: Re : Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

On 4/4/13 11:27 AM, mengualjean...@free.fr wrote: > Hi, > > Does some cycle exist about releasing of OOo? Because since the schedule, it > seems that OOo 4.0 will not include current work about accessibility. It is a > pitty as I think it is a major contribution and it would be a pitty if we >

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Thanks, Rob, et al., > > On 13-04-03, at 22:22 , Peter Junge wrote: > > > One way of implementing this would be to look at all commits for the > >>> past 6 > months (or 1 year?) and remove authorization on /trunk, /tag an

[Proposal]: Call for donations

Hi, in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't know and we can probably figure this out but the question is what can we do ti collect more donations and use our brand more effective. When I look on our main website I fo

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:22:33 +0200 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any > impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't know and we can > probably figure this out but the question is what can we do ti collect > more donations

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

On 4/4/13 2:46 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:22:33 +0200 > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any >> impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't know and we can >> probably figure this out but the ques

Re: Binfilter removal - PATCH

>>> Anyone against the lazy approach - ie. doing this on trunk directly? This >>> could make testing much easier... >> >> +1 please do it on trunk ! > It is already disabled by default when we build snapshots. I don't see any > reason against doing it on trunk. Done on trunk. Module binfilter

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any > impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't know and we can > probably figure this out but the question is what can we do ti collect > more donations and u

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

Am 04.04.13 14:22, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't know and we can probably figure this out but the question is what can we do ti collect more donations and use our brand more eff

[Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra manual work. Furthermore I would like the 4.0 language files to be clean

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Dave Fisher wrote: Let's focus only on adding one new authz list for the code tree. Call it openoffice-coders and populate it with those who HAVE any commit activity in the current code tree. I checked feasibility with Infra. Summary: 1) LDAP is not the solution. Rule it out. 2) The only poss

RE: [Proposal]: Call for donations

The PPMC went through this some time ago, because there were OO.o-specific donation mechanisms that had to be either retired or redirected to ASF donations. (There is a small-donation place for ASF donations. I used it once to see how it worked.) Start here:

Re: [UX] Design Exploration - AOO 4.0 Sidebar Specific Content Panel Design

Hi all , We have updated a new version of design proposal after redefining some detail issues. Please find the design proposal by the link: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOO_UX_Design_Exploration_-_Task_Pane_Content_Panel_-_User_Interface_Design_Proposals#Sidebar_Content_Panel_-_UX_Design_propo

RE: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

In previous generations of this kind of discussion, the ASF old-hands will point out that the social process works quite well, folks don't do commits unless they feel qualified to do so, and it is often the case that committers will request RTC (i.e., submit patches rather than update the SVN) i

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > In previous generations of this kind of discussion, the ASF old-hands will > point out that the social process works quite well, folks don't do commits > unless they feel qualified to do so, and it is often the case that > committers wi

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Let's focus only on adding one new authz list for the code tree. >> Call it openoffice-coders and populate it with those who HAVE any >> commit activity in the current code tree. >> > > I checked feasibility with Inf

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot > of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in > the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra > manual work. Fu

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

Hi Jürgen, Hi all, Is there an official terminology to describe the sidebar and its different parts ? A+ -- gw 2013/4/4 Jürgen Schmidt > On 2/20/13 11:32 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 2/20/13 10:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> we make good progress with the sidebar work wh

Re: Re : Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/4/13 11:27 AM, mengualjean...@free.fr wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does some cycle exist about releasing of OOo? Because since the > schedule, it seems that OOo 4.0 will not include current work about > accessibility. It is a pitty as I think

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 2) The only possible solution would be an authz rule like suggested by Dave here; however, Infra quite discourages it, mainly for maintenance reasons. This leads me to think we would need some good justifications for impleme

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On 4 April 2013 19:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> 2) The only possible solution would be an authz rule like suggested by >>> Dave here; however, Infra quite discourages it, mainly for maintenance >>> reasons. This l

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Speaking as one of those "old-hands", Dennis is absolutely spot-on. Partitions, barriers, sub-groups... I call those "divisive" mechanisms which serve to divide the community. Such divisions are rarely needed. As Andrea points out, in Subversion's 13 year history, we have only *requested* people

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Also, let me say one more thing: This notion of creating divisions among committers ... it is "solving" a problem that has never occurred here. NEVER. OCCURRED. In the Foundations's 14+ year history, we have never seen a trojan commit. Our servers have been compromised a handful of times. When w

RE: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

If the problem is that there are abandoned Apache credentials out there for the taking, the solution is to deal with the inactive committers and revocation of those credentials. And to assume that some sudden resuscitation can go unnoticed strikes me as not very plausible. (It strikes me as fa

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Also, let me say one more thing: > > This notion of creating divisions among committers ... it is "solving" > a problem that has never occurred here. > > NEVER. OCCURRED. > > So frickin' what? That is entirely irrelevant. My house has never b

tpcolor.cxx

Hello I've made changes to the module cui (tpcolor.cxx): http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/cui/source/tabpages/tpcolor.cxx#465 I want to know which modules should I build or explain me what modules are built by editing the file tpcolor.cxx and why? Regards.

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

Guy Waterval schrieb: Hi Jürgen, Hi all, Is there an official terminology to describe the sidebar and its different parts ? A+ Yes, look at http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Sidebar section "Glossary" and the picture on the right side there. Kind regards Regina

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > If the problem is that there are abandoned Apache credentials out there > for the taking, the solution is to deal with the inactive committers and > revocation of those credentials. And to assume that some sudden > resuscitation can go u

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Sorry for talk posting. I get it now. If AOO is more secure than other Apache projects than this may give the impression that the other projects are less secure because they do not take these precautions. No project can be better than others since that implies some are worse. So any attempt to

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Your proposal to alter the community structure is premised upon a strawman risk. First, that it would occur. Second, that it wouldn't be noticed. Third, that it would find its way into users' hands. In the past, the Foundation has *explicitly* said that we would accept a certain level of risk to m

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot > of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in > the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra > manual work. F

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Sarcasm accepted. Thank you. On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:54:41PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > Sorry for talk posting. I get it now. If AOO is more secure than other > Apache projects than this may give the impression that the other projects > are less secure because they do not take these precautions

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Your proposal to alter the community structure is premised upon a > strawman risk. First, that it would occur. Second, that it wouldn't be > noticed. Third, that it would find its way into users' hands. > > So you are asserting that someone who

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

Hi, sorry for my top posting but I always fail to quote emails like this correct. It is no big thing here, the ASF had a pay pal account and people can donate whatever they want. We simply have to encourage people to do it and gave to make clear that donations are made for ASF and not only AO

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed schedule for AOO 4.0

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 19:40 schrieb Kay Schenk: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > On 4/4/13 11:27 AM, mengualjean...@free.fr wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does some cycle exist about releasing of OOo? Because since the > > schedule, it seems that OOo 4.0 wil

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On 4 April 2013 21:03, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > Your proposal to alter the community structure is premised upon a > > strawman risk. First, that it would occur. Second, that it wouldn't be > > noticed. Third, that it would find its way into users'

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot > > of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in > > the l10n branch. This is a bad combin

RE: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

OK, I will speak further. There are no such people among the current committers. It took *more* than being on the June 2011 proposal to become established as an initial committer. And you know that. There was considerable activity to on-board the willing and have them be established as com

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > OK, I will speak further. > > There are no such people among the current committers. It took *more* > than being on the June 2011 proposal to become established as an initial > committer. And you know that. There was considerable activ

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, janI wrote: > On 4 April 2013 21:03, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > Your proposal to alter the community structure is premised upon a > > > strawman risk. First, that it would occur. Second, that it wouldn't be >

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

Ah NO.  Those so-called "phantom" committers had their commit to this projext revoked when you graduated to a TLP, but the larger point that Greg's making remains true- it is a false sense of security to rely on ACL's to pretend you don't need to vet your commit list.  See http://www.apache.org/dev

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Ah NO. Those so-called "phantom" committers > had their commit to this projext revoked when you graduated > Hi Joe, See the list here: http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#openoffice I've been tracking the length of that l

RE: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

You're *still* understating the extent of the ceremony. They had to go through everything a subsequently-invited committer had to do, even though Sam Ruby provided the initial instructions. But thanks for mentioning the iCLA. That is an useful object to have on file in tracking down a possibl

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > You're *still* understating the extent of the ceremony. They had to go > through everything a subsequently-invited committer had to do, even though > Sam Ruby provided the initial instructions. But thanks for mentioning the > iCLA. Tha

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

Am 04/04/2013 04:29 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher: Am 04.04.13 14:22, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't know and we can probably figure this out but the question is what can we do ti

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 04/04/2013 04:29 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher: > > Am 04.04.13 14:22, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> in relation to our budget planning I asked myself if OpenOffice has any >>> impact on the donations to the ASF? Well I don't kn

Re: questions about Base---do we need an embedded DB?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Max Merbald wrote: > Hello there, > > while the base module of AOO is not used all that often, it's the only > free database software. You may want to take a look at this page from Wikipedia. Not guaranteed of course. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fre

Re: Binfilter removal - PATCH

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Pavel Janík wrote: > > >>> Anyone against the lazy approach - ie. doing this on trunk directly? > This > >>> could make testing much easier... > >> > >> +1 please do it on trunk ! > > It is already disabled by default when we build snapshots. I don't see > any rea

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

Am 04/04/2013 05:21 PM, schrieb janI: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra manual work. Furthermore I would

Re: [Website] Re-locate images from "download/images/" to "images/"

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 04/01/2013 03:12 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> I want to cleanup the structure and remove 1 of the 2 directories for >>> images. >>> >>> Therefore I've added the

Re: Why can't I find open office 2.3 for mac osx 10.5.8 on the website?

Am 04/03/2013 11:52 PM, schrieb David Coldwell: version 3.0 files won't load into version 2.3 so I have to replace 3.0 with 2.3. If you are searching for older version of OpenOffice please have a look for our archive: en-US builds: http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/stable/ locali

Re: [Website] Re-locate images from "download/images/" to "images/"

Am 04/04/2013 11:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 04/01/2013 03:12 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Hi Rob, I want to cleanup the structure and remove 1 of the 2 directories for images. Theref

Re: [Website] Re-locate images from "download/images/" to "images/"

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > > Am 04/01/2013 03:12 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Rob, > >>> > >>> I want to cleanup the structure and remove 1

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 04.04.13 14:22, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: And opinions or further ideas how we can improve this? It shouldn't be a big problem for us to collect the money we need. I disagree. Yes, we can help with foundings for ASF, but please do this on ASF Level. Founding money is not

Re: [Website] Re-locate images from "download/images/" to "images/"

Am 04/05/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 04/01/2013 03:12 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Hi Rob, I want to cleanup the structure an

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

FWIW last time I checked there was a huge increase in paypal donations once OpenOffice adjusted it's contribution page accordingly. On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Raphael Bircher wrote: >> Am 04.04.13 14:22, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>> And opinions or further ideas how we

"Easy hack" for website

I just entered a BZ issue : https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122003 "Missing tag on many webpages" If there are any new volunteers looking for how to get started, this is one easy way that does not require any programming. We need someone to review a bunch of HTML pages and add ti

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

You might want to talk to fundraising@ before you do anything --- not as much for permission as for ideas on how to frame the "Please donate" request. (fundraising@ is privately-archived) Joseph Schaefer wrote on Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 18:38:18 -0400: > FWIW last time I checked there was a huge inc

RE: questions about Base---do we need an embedded DB?

The link to OpenOffice.org Base is interesting. I wonder if the decision about SQLite (or a variant) should be reconsidered for a re-engineered AOO Base. It essentially depends on how important SQL is. And of course, it would be just to furnish a default built-in DBMS. - Dennis "Small. Fast

Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN

On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:17 PM, janI wrote: > On 4 April 2013 21:03, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> Your proposal to alter the community structure is premised upon a >>> strawman risk. First, that it would occur. Second, that it wouldn't be >>> noti

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

We can easily copy the "Donate" button from the footer to the topnav. We can request that l10n teams add a translated donate button for their language. If they haven't translated their brand and topnav now would a time to do so. We would want to translate the fundraising page, too. Is this a ve

Re: [Website] Re-locate images from "download/images/" to "images/"

All image directories and img links can be discovered and converted in an offline checkout of the site. It could be automated. Different image files of the same name can be diffed. It is all discoverable. Doing it manually is a mess. I discovered this during the ooo-site port from Oracle's Ken

OpenOffice Cases of Success

Anyone with information on success stories of the suite for example: schools, governments.. en donde se utilice la suite regards -- *Galileo Teco Juarez* *Web:* http://80bits.wordpress.com *Twitter:* @genitalico *Linkedin:* http://mx.linkedin.com/pub/galileo-teco-

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > We can easily copy the "Donate" button from the footer to the topnav. > > The pages are already so busy that making anything stand out is rather difficult. I'll give you an example. We (Samer and I) did an experiment with different placements

Re: OpenOffice Cases of Success

On 13-04-04, at 22:10 , Galileo Teco Juárez wrote: > Anyone with information on success stories of the suite > for example: > schools, governments.. > en donde se utilice la suite > This is old. It needs to be updated, but could still prove useful. http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOf

Re: "Easy hack" for website

Rob could you possibly export the pages missing titles in a CSV, one per line? I'll check google analytics to see if there is a page visit export feature and then prioritize. I would also surface NL homepages for example, even if a language doesn't as many hit, the home page should be at least tit

Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo

Hello Everyone, Can I propose we move forward with this logo: http://imagebin.org/252847 I kept the current official blue for both the logo and word 'Open' in the wordmark because the word 'Open' gets less emphasis with the lighter blue. I also gave the text Apache a placement inside the valley ma

Re: OpenOffice Cases of Success

excelent thanks 2013/4/4 Louis Suárez-Potts > > On 13-04-04, at 22:10 , Galileo Teco Juárez wrote: > > > Anyone with information on success stories of the suite > > for example: > > schools, governments.. > > en donde se utilice la suite > > > > This is old. It needs to be updated, but could

Re: Why can't I find open office 2.3 for mac osx 10.5.8 on the website?

Am 04.04.13 23:40, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 04/03/2013 11:52 PM, schrieb David Coldwell: version 3.0 files won't load into version 2.3 so I have to replace 3.0 with 2.3. If you are searching for older version of OpenOffice please have a look for our archive: en-US builds: http://archive.apa

Re: Binfilter removal - PATCH

> Excellent! > > What should we put in the Release Notes for this? We are started to > collect the info here: Changes that Impact Backwards Compatibility Module binfilter removed -> we do no longer support old fileformats from StarOffice. -- Pavel Janík ---

Re: [Proposal]: Call for donations

On 4/5/13 12:38 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > FWIW last time I checked there was a huge increase > in paypal donations once OpenOffice adjusted it's > contribution page accordingly. > that is what I have expected of course. I know the numbers of the past ;-) But we can do better and can benefit al