Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-07-03 Thread FR web forum
Is this: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176 is fixed with 4.1.4? I can't test cause I don't have Windows 32-bit. - Mail original - De: "Jörg Schmidt" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Juin 2017 21:32:16 Objet: i have tested (was: Test builds

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hmm, seems my fun LVL is low. It is just an advert. It is fine if you like it your way. But I really really recommend you take at least a look. Maybe it has some ideas for you. Since the tool is only a PowerShell script. And Windows install mechanics need some love... ;) All the best Peter Am

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:peter.kov...@posteo.de] > Windows98 is not a good reference in total. > I would only compare it to the NT series. And all of them > where stable depending what you install. My statement was just a joke. Of course it is not right to compare Windows 98SE directly wit

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Peter Kovacs
Windows98 is not a good reference in total. I would only compare it to the NT series. And all of them where stable depending what you install. I would like to advertise Chocolatey, the Windows Paket Manager. It is really the way to go if you want to do server based installations. All the best P

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > >> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-) > >> http://www.7-zip.de/ > > OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything > is fine now. > > 7-zip 9.20 i

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 29.06.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > > >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] >> Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-) >> http://www.7-zip.de/ > OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything is fine now. 7-zip 9.20 is almost 7 years old. Only

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Upgrade to the latest (stable) version... ;-) > http://www.7-zip.de/ OK, I have updated, 7zip 16.04 works correctly. Everything is fine now. Jörg - To unsubsc

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 29.06.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] >> Why unpack it? > because it is more convenient, if I want to make a server installation (setup > /a) afterwards. > I can do the extraction to the desired directory without having to choo

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Why unpack it? because it is more convenient, if I want to make a server installation (setup /a) afterwards. I can do the extraction to the desired directory without having to choose, because the right command is in the context me

Re: i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 29.06.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > Hello, > >> I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages. > Thank you. > > I have tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Win_x86_install_de.exe, no problems. That sounds good! > But I have made a strange observation: > If I try to u

i have tested (was: Test builds for Windows)

2017-06-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages. Thank you. I have tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Win_x86_install_de.exe, no problems. But I have made a strange observation: If I try to unpack the installation package with 7Zip does not work, but there is an er