yes kind of. I have seeb BeanUtil and maybe BSF (I am not sure) and I
thought those were successor with the project.
But it quickly turned out it has been a misunderstanding on my side.
BSF supplies a nice vierity of Scripting Languages. Maybe it is good to
keep it in mind for later. As an op
Were you looking for Apache Commons BSF?
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bsf/
> On Apr 24, 2020, at 6:50 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> I would like to remove stlport from code. We already build without it, and no
> one is using it. We have a Repository system for mana
I just wanted to say in a complicated way that I told what I knew. And I
don't think it is worth to do a lot of research to convince others.
Am 30.04.20 um 00:41 schrieb Marcus:
Am 29.04.20 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Please understand that I assume a per default some resistance towards
cha
Am 29.04.20 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Please understand that I assume a per default some resistance towards
change. I see it as feature not as failure, we are a bit conservative
for a reason.
But as a reaction I save my time a bit, where I think it is a waste.
I don't understand what yo
Hi Markus,
Please understand that I assume a per default some resistance towards
change. I see it as feature not as failure, we are a bit conservative
for a reason.
But as a reaction I save my time a bit, where I think it is a waste.
So which Information do you exactly need?
My Current s
Am 25.04.20 um 03:50 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I would like to remove stlport from code. We already build without it,
and no one is using it. We have a Repository system for managing old
code. We do not need to carry stuff we do not use.
Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am
I have seen you on the repository of beanshell. I stared the project now
and fully watching it. It is all I can do for now. But if there is
something I send in patches.
So far no objections for STLPORT removal. -> STLPORT is still on.
Beanshell is still an own Project -> BEANSHELL is off.
I
Hi guys;
FWIW, I am involved in beanshell in my spare time, which is not plenty
lately. As mentioned previously it is in github now and a much improved
version will be released one day (no ETA).
While looking for candidates to remove stuff, consider stax. It is
included in Java since JDK5.
Pedro
Okay, thanks Damjan.
I found the mail in Apache Commons and some other mentions.
So I think I got confused.
Am 25.04.20 um 08:42 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking
into it, the pr
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking
> into it, the project moved to Apache Commons. I hope that it is still
> there under a different name (beanUtil?)
>
>
See https://github.com/beanshell/beanshell#history
Be
Maybe I was not clear enough.
beanshell we use is unmaintained and very old.
A potential successor is in Apache-Commons. I am investigating.
Without a valid successor we will not drop. In doubt we have to adopt
and maintain.
But I dont thionk so. I already found the vote in Apache Common to
Hello,
I want to brint to attention that we can use BEANSHELL for writing
Macros. This is one point beside Basic, Javascript and Python.
This shouldn't be cut.
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 25.04.20 um 03:50 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I would like to remove stlport from code. We al
Hello all,
I would like to remove stlport from code. We already build without it,
and no one is using it. We have a Repository system for managing old
code. We do not need to carry stuff we do not use.
Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking
into it, the project
13 matches
Mail list logo
