Am 29.04.20 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Please understand that I assume a per default some resistance towards
change. I see it as feature not as failure, we are a bit conservative
for a reason.
But as a reaction I save my time a bit, where I think it is a waste.
I don't understand what you want to tell me here as this is out of context.
So which Information do you exactly need?
Actually I cannot really help here as I'm not a developer. However I
would think that it is helping more to tell some more background of the
potential removal candidate. Thats all. ;-)
Thanks
Marcus
Am 29.04.20 um 00:56 schrieb Marcus:
Am 25.04.20 um 03:50 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I would like to remove stlport from code. We already build without
it, and no one is using it. We have a Repository system for managing
old code. We do not need to carry stuff we do not use.
Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking
into it, the project moved to Apache Commons. I hope that it is still
there under a different name (beanUtil?)
Cleaning out stuff is important.
right.
Howeverr, when you write for which the ressources are used it would be
easier to judge if it can be really dropped or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
