Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-30 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:43:29PM -0700, Fred Ollinger wrote: Did you create a single spec to build the rpms for the whole office? If you are interested in researching this, you can look at how it was done in Fedora: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?bu

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-29 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Fred, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:43:29PM -0700, Fred Ollinger wrote: > > Did you create a single spec to build the rpms for the whole office? If you are interested in researching this, you can look at how it was done in Fedora: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=276232 Downlo

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Fred Ollinger
I did not. >From rereading your email, you seem ahead of me. Didn't want to give the wrong impression. I'll try your epm stuff when I get a chance on fedora rawhide. Fred On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Fred, > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:58:07AM -0700, Fr

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 um 16:24 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 3/28/13 2:09 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > Hi Kay, > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:27:30AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > No. The spec

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Fred, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:58:07AM -0700, Fred Ollinger wrote: > I built an epm package and can send it to you if you like or whatever. > I have a spec as well. Did you create a single spec to build the rpms for the whole office? This would be nice, to see how you managed the obsoletes,

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Fred Ollinger
I built an epm package and can send it to you if you like or whatever. I have a spec as well. Just email me in private. Fred On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 3/28/13 2:09 PM, Ariel Constenla-Hail

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 3/28/13 2:09 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > Hi Kay, > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:27:30AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> No. The spec are generated at build time and removed once each > >>> package each built, so there

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/28/13 2:09 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Kay, > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:27:30AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> No. The spec are generated at build time and removed once each >>> package each built, so there is no way to get the spec from the >>> build (besides, those spec are gener

Re: SRPM Request

2013-03-28 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Kay, On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:27:30AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > >No. The spec are generated at build time and removed once each package > >each built, so there is no way to get the spec from the build (besides, > >those spec are generated at runtime and are dependent on configure > >switches

Re: SRPM Request

2012-12-12 Thread Lee Ward
On 12/11/2012 02:27 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 12/09/2012 12:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 10:54:34AM +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: > I looked around a bit but could not find any. Specifically, if > I could get the SRPM intended for the Fedora build wou

Re: SRPM Request

2012-12-10 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/09/2012 12:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 10:54:34AM +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: I looked around a bit but could not find any. Specifically, if I could get the SRPM intended for the Fedora build would be greatly appreciated. The build are "universal build

Re: SRPM Request

2012-12-09 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 10:54:34AM +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: > >>I looked around a bit but could not find any. Specifically, if > >>I could get the SRPM intended for the Fedora build would be greatly > >>appreciated. > >The build are "universal builds", not different builds targeted to > >spec

Re: SRPM Request

2012-12-09 Thread Issac Goldstand
On 12/8/2012 3:58 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Lee, On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:31:14PM +0900, Lee Ward wrote: I noticed that there are RPM's available for OpenOffice. Are the SRPMS also available? No, there are no SRPMS, and it doesn't sound plausible. The source is released only in com

Re: SRPM Request

2012-12-08 Thread Lee Ward
Okay. Thank you. The reason I was asking is I am on the team for the Fuduntu distro and the project lead an I were talking about the feasibility of packaging up OpenOffice so that we can have it available in our repos. I'll look into checking out the source and seeing how difficult it will be to bu

Re: SRPM Request

2012-12-08 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Lee, On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:31:14PM +0900, Lee Ward wrote: > I noticed that there are RPM's available for OpenOffice. Are the SRPMS > also available? No, there are no SRPMS, and it doesn't sound plausible. The source is released only in compressed files: http://www.openoffice.org/download

SRPM Request

2012-12-08 Thread Lee Ward
I noticed that there are RPM's available for OpenOffice. Are the SRPMS also available? I looked around a bit but could not find any. Specifically, if I could get the SRPM intended for the Fedora build would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Lee Ward