Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2018, at 2:04 PM, toki wrote: > >> On 03/16/2018 07:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Sorry, I was not clear. > > I saw it as a request to look for trademark/copyright violations. > (One of my other projects is trying to determine who the de juro and de >

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

On 03/16/2018 07:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Sorry, I was not clear. I saw it as a request to look for trademark/copyright violations. (One of my other projects is trying to determine who the de juro and de facto copyright owner of about 100 books, written by the same person, is. Paraphrasing wh

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

Dave Fisher wrote: We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice&sort=users Please have a look as I think we should make some changes. The page https://www.openhub.net/p/openoffice is full of inaccuracies and shows that they are not even able to maintain data: they report o

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

Hi - Sorry, I was not clear. We should police our own project as it is listed as Java and not updated recently. Why is that? Regards, Dave > On Mar 16, 2018, at 12:14 PM, toki wrote: > > On 03/16/2018 05:56 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=op

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

On 03/16/2018 05:56 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice&sort=users > There are, rounded off, 430 projects listed there. Based upon looking at about a quarter of the pages, it looks lik

Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

Hi - I’m currently doing a review of OpenOffice trademarks by repeating the Suitable Name Search. We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice&sort=users Please have a look as I think we should make some changes. Reg