Hi - Sorry, I was not clear. We should police our own project as it is listed as Java and not updated recently. Why is that?
Regards, Dave > On Mar 16, 2018, at 12:14 PM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 03/16/2018 05:56 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice&sort=users >> <https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice&sort=users> > > There are, rounded off, 430 projects listed there. > > Based upon looking at about a quarter of the pages, it looks like > roughly: > * 10% are specifically related to OOo l10n & i18n projects; > * 20% are language specific libraries to utilize OOo documents; > * 20% are extensions for OOo, AOo, EO, and LibO; > * 50% are backoffice programs that can either import or edit OOo documents; > * a third of the projects are obsolete/abandoned; > >> Please have a look as I think we should make some changes. > > * Are there any listings that you have specific concerns about; > > * Break this up into smaller tasks. > I can't look at all 430, but I could look at between half a dozen and a > dozen - with very good odds that somebody else that can look at a dozen > will pick the same dozen I pick. > > jonathon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
