Am 10/21/2016 03:44 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@
This might be because of the current documentation workflow:
recruitment@ is list
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
> Most new people are joining dev@
This might be because of the current documentation workflow:
recruitment@ is listed in get-involved.mdtext, but this page may lead to
th
The traffic on development was a barrier for me.
I did not consider recruitment, because I did not see it in the wiki
joining page.
Maybe if the recruitment section on the wiki is more generic and guides the
interested persons there first, it would be used more.
However because I want to develop I
On 10/21/2016 5:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
like a dismal failure.
With 20/20 hindsight, it does not seem to have been useful. The question
was whether dev@'s high traff
