Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 04.11.2013 16:53, janI wrote: > >> On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: >> >>> On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote: >>> On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote: > On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: > >> Hi

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 11/4/13 4:53 PM, janI wrote: > On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: >> >> On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote: >>> On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote: On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: > > Hi > > I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and al

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Andre Fischer
On 04.11.2013 16:53, janI wrote: On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote: On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote: On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: Hi I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other comments. But my original

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread janI
On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: > > On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote: > >> > >> On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other > >>> comments. > >>> >

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote: > On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote: >> >> On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other >>> comments. >>> >>> But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build >

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 04.11.2013 15:41, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 04.11.2013 15:30, Andre Fischer wrote: On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: [...] But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ? I think that I have added the ext_libra

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread janI
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote: > > On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other >> comments. >> >> But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system >> to do ratscan, or is the ratscan t

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 04.11.2013 15:30, Andre Fischer wrote: On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: [...] But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ? I think that I have added the ext_libraries/ratscan/ module. It is built and sta

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Andre Fischer
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote: Hi I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other comments. But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ? I think that I have added the ext_libraries/rats

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread janI
Hi I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other comments. But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ? rgds jan I.

Re: ratscan

2013-11-04 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 11/3/13 8:29 PM, janI wrote: > On 3 November 2013 19:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote: The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1 a rel

Re: ratscan

2013-11-03 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 03.11.2013 20:29, janI wrote: it sure looks like it, thx for correcting me. [...] Besides, build-bot openoffice-linux64-rat runs the target weekly: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ that runs on trunk, and not on the branches. Yes, I noticed that too. So I committed r879545/r879

Re: ratscan

2013-11-03 Thread janI
On 3 November 2013 19:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote: > > > The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan > > > output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1 > > > a release this is something that PMC me

Re: ratscan

2013-11-03 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote: > > The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan > > output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1 > > a release this is something that PMC members must check. This is > > more important to get correct than

Re: ratscan

2013-11-03 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:47 PM, janI wrote: > On 2 November 2013 23:03, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > > > Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan. > > > > > > On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote: > > > > > > > Hi

Re: ratscan

2013-11-02 Thread janI
On 2 November 2013 23:03, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Hi Jan, > > > > Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan. > > > > On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > As part of making a new central Makefile I found the ta

Re: ratscan

2013-11-02 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Jan, > > Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan. > > On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target "ratscan". > > > > Do we actively use this target or is it a l

Re: ratscan

2013-11-02 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Jan, Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan. On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target "ratscan". > > Do we actively use this target or is it a leftover from the move to ASF ? The project must do ratscans actively.