Hi Jan, Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target "ratscan". > > Do we actively use this target or is it a leftover from the move to ASF ? The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1 a release this is something that PMC members must check. This is more important to get correct than the code quality. IMO - If you are thinking about auto-build with digital signing then the ratscan must pass before signed artifacts are generated. It is not required to make a nightly build. For this thread we are only discussing the parts of our svn tree that we release. [1] Best Regards, Dave [1] There is an inactive flame (and let's leave it that way please) about the parts of the Symphony contribution that are yet to be moved into active development. > > rgds > jan I. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
