Re: Beanshell

2020-12-16 Thread Carl Marcum
That's great Jim! On 12/16/20 11:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a FYI: I have been invited to the official BeanShell team and so it is likely that my fork will be folded back into beanshell.org as the v2.x version while we work on the v3.x version in parallel. Right now I have a 2.2.0b1 rel

Re: Beanshell

2020-12-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
Just a FYI: I have been invited to the official BeanShell team and so it is likely that my fork will be folded back into beanshell.org as the v2.x version while we work on the v3.x version in parallel. Right now I have a 2.2.0b1 release and I'm looking into seeing how far we can take it. > On

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

2020-12-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Just a FYI that I've been hacking on https://github.com/jimjag/beanshell2 which is merge of 2.0b6 and beanshell2. > On Dec 7, 2020, at 8:06 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: >> Hello Jim >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> There appears t

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

2020-12-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently HEAD of master. I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this part works. This is odd.

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

2020-12-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 07.12.20 23:34, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:  On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently H

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

2020-12-07 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > >  >> On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: >> Hello Jim >> >>> Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what >>> is currently HEAD of master. >>

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

2020-12-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently HEAD of master. I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this part works. Ok. Now the b

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

2020-12-07 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is > currently HEAD of master. I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this part works. Now the build hangs with hsqldb there I have no su

Re: Question ad Groovy implementation (Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Carl, On 15.07.2020 01:49, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Rony, > > On 7/14/20 10:11 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> Hi Carl, >> >> ... cut ... > > I'm planning a more formal announcement as soon as I finish the Readme's for > a couple of these but... > > There are a few inter-dependent projects. > >

Re: Question ad Groovy implementation (Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-14 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Rony, On 7/14/20 10:11 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Carl, On 13.07.2020 22:07, Carl Marcum wrote: ... cut ... Currently my Groovy macro is a standalone extension. We can discuss later after I announce it's information whether it could be added to the office at some point or left as a

Question ad Groovy implementation (Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-14 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Carl, On 13.07.2020 22:07, Carl Marcum wrote: ... cut ... > Currently my Groovy macro is a standalone extension. > > We can discuss later after I announce it's information whether it could be > added to the office at > some point or left as a soon-to-be-popular extension ;) Could you briefly

Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Carl, Am 13.07.20 um 22:07 schrieb Carl Marcum: > Hi Matthias, > > On 7/13/20 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 13.07.20 um 12:37 schrieb Peter: >>> At build there is a beanshell switch, which turns the feature on. >> >> "--enable-beanshell" activates it. >> >> This wasn

Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-13 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Matthias, On 7/13/20 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Peter, Am 13.07.20 um 12:37 schrieb Peter: At build there is a beanshell switch, which turns the feature on. "--enable-beanshell" activates it. This wasn't necessary for 4.1.x but we should include it now in our 42X build scripts

Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Peter, Am 13.07.20 um 12:37 schrieb Peter: > At build there is a beanshell switch, which turns the feature on. "--enable-beanshell" activates it. This wasn't necessary for 4.1.x but we should include it now in our 42X build scripts. @Carl: This is for Groovy? Regards,    Matthias > > > Am

Re: Beanshell Scripting

2020-07-13 Thread Peter
At build there is a beanshell switch, which turns the feature on. Am 13.07.20 um 12:27 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, Have Beanshell macros been intentionally disabled in trunk? I don't see the option in Tools > Macros > Organize Macros. Or maybe I need a configure flag for it? Thanks, Carl

Re: beanshell

2019-01-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Sorry for noticing late. beanshell was relicensed under an Apache License starting with bsh 2.0b5. Apparently I had something to do with breaking the beanshell build (thanks for fixing): on FreeBSD we use the external (prepackaged) beanshell which is 2.0b6. Pedro.

Re: beanshell

2019-01-18 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 18.01.19 um 16:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Hrmmm... doing a re-build w/ --enable-beanshell causes as break in > scripting/java: > > > /Users/jim/src/asf/AOO42X/main/scripting/java/com/sun/star/script/framework/provider/beanshell/ScriptProviderForBeanShell.java:232: > error: packag

Re: beanshell

2019-01-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hrmmm... doing a re-build w/ --enable-beanshell causes as break in scripting/java: /Users/jim/src/asf/AOO42X/main/scripting/java/com/sun/star/script/framework/provider/beanshell/ScriptProviderForBeanShell.java:232: error: package bsh does not exist catch (bsh.EvalError e) { not

Re: Beanshell now under an Apache License

2015-01-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Actually ... I had to revert this as I had forgotten about some small adjustments. Will be back to this later. Pedro. On 01/11/15 15:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; One of the great achievements behind this project is the ability to open new code under a less restrictive license for use in o

Re: Beanshell now under an Apache License

2015-01-11 Thread Marcus
Am 01/11/2015 09:50 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni: Hello; One of the great achievements behind this project is the ability to open new code under a less restrictive license for use in other Apache Projects. The author of beanshell, Patrick Niemeyer, generously agreed to make the sources for his pro

Re: BeanShell to join the Apache Incubator

2013-02-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > There is a proposal for BeanShell to join the Apache Incubator: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal > > BeanShell is one of the Apache OpenOffice build dependencies, currently > minimally maintained, and it would be good to