Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

2018-12-05 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Mechtilde Thanks! That was easy ;) Regards, Pedro > On December 5, 2018 at 9:11 AM Mechtilde < o...@mechtilde.de > mailto:o...@mechtilde.de > wrote: > > > Hello Pedro > > Am 05.12.18 um 00:42 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > > > > > > > > On December 4

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

2018-12-05 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Pedro Am 05.12.18 um 00:42 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >> On December 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >> >> On 26/11/2018 Mechtilde wrote: >>> I started there: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_from_4.2 >> >> Thanks for bringing us back on track for localization. > > An

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

2018-12-04 Thread Mechtilde
Am 04.12.18 um 23:09 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 26/11/2018 Mechtilde wrote: >> I started there: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_from_4.2 > > Thanks for bringing us back on track for localization. The documentation > is still a bit short, but progress on Pootle is really nice. I

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

2018-12-04 Thread Pedro Lino
> On December 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > On 26/11/2018 Mechtilde wrote: > > I started there: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_from_4.2 > > Thanks for bringing us back on track for localization. Any chance I can download the whole structure from https://home

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

2018-12-04 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 26/11/2018 Mechtilde wrote: I started there: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_from_4.2 Thanks for bringing us back on track for localization. The documentation is still a bit short, but progress on Pootle is really nice. Do we have a VM snapshot from before the first upload of

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

2018-11-26 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Andrea, Am 26.11.18 um 00:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 25/11/2018 Mechtilde wrote:> now I'm able to create sdf files based > on the source code and the files >> in Pootle. > > (changing subject since I'm not commenting on the build issue, but on > the other information). > > This is go