Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 09/03/16 11:07, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Someone with access, please upload the Python-2.7.12 tar ball for extra
safety.
And while there, the dejavu fonts version 2.37 may be a good idea too.
Both uploaded. But you should join the OOoExtras admins too. If you have
a Sourc
On 09/03/16 11:07, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
FWIW, the apache-extras.org site that carried the OOo extras tarballs
has been redirected to the sourceforge site. The oooextras.mirror site
at sourceforge has a circular reference to the OOO Extras Web Site that
is now redundant.
Someone with
Hello;
FWIW, the apache-extras.org site that carried the OOo extras tarballs
has been redirected to the sourceforge site. The oooextras.mirror site
at sourceforge has a circular reference to the OOO Extras Web Site that
is now redundant.
Someone with access, please upload the Python-2.7.12
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 03/15/2015 12:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Are you confusing two different repositories? We have:
1) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/ext_sources/
This is for dependencies that are under a compatible license
2) OOO Extras in its current form at Google Code or
ttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/ext_sources/
> This is for dependencies that are under a compatible license
>
> 2) OOO Extras in its current form at Google Code or SourceForge
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/
> This is for optional dependenci
://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/
Are you confusing two different repositories? We have:
1) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/ext_sources/
This is for dependencies that are under a compatible license
2) OOO Extras in its current form at Google Code or SourceForge
http
On 03/03/2015 03:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Do we have any further information on moving ooo-extras (backups of
> external libraries) or any extras to SourceForge and what form this
> might take? Latest discussion --
>
> http://markmail.org/message/xfiafpfvhvbe4tiv
>
> We&
Do we have any further information on moving ooo-extras (backups of
external libraries) or any extras to SourceForge and what form this
might take? Latest discussion --
http://markmail.org/message/xfiafpfvhvbe4tiv
We've updated at least 2 libraries already and more will likely be needed.
I
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> Just a heads up:
>
> We are using ooo-extras [1] as reliable mirror to the upstream locations of
> third party code with non-permissive licenses. Today's google opensource
> blog [2] says that this method will stop working
it all:
>
> https://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/ooo-**extras/<https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/>
>
ups, you are quite right, I will just keep monitor that we dont get thrown
off the waggon, when it changes.
rgds
jan I.
>
> So: ooo-extra
janI wrote:
Same discussion runs on infra for apache-extra. Maybe we should move our
things to apache-extra, and have them provide/maintain the service.
It's already there, right? Well, the URL says it all:
https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/
So: ooo-extras is pa
On 23 May 2013 09:26, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> Just a heads up:
>
> We are using ooo-extras [1] as reliable mirror to the upstream locations
> of third party code with non-permissive licenses. Today's google opensource
> blog [2] says that this method will stop working in 2014.
Just a heads up:
We are using ooo-extras [1] as reliable mirror to the upstream locations
of third party code with non-permissive licenses. Today's google
opensource blog [2] says that this method will stop working in 2014. We
need to find an alternative.
Herbert
[1]
13 matches
Mail list logo
