On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 j.nitschke wrote:
>>
>> But a global haltOnFailure would stop the build at 'svn info' step.
>> About the 'svn info' step, this one stopped working ...
>
>
> And we are back here, it seems. With the HTTPS fixes now in place, a
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:53:43 +0200 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> And we are back here, it seems. With the HTTPS fixes now in place, all
> the Linux and FreeBSD buildbots completed their build successfully,
> while the Windows one ran build --all but then suddenly stopped almost
> at the end, after deliv
On 01/02/2016 j.nitschke wrote:
But a global haltOnFailure would stop the build at 'svn info' step.
About the 'svn info' step, this one stopped working ...
And we are back here, it seems. With the HTTPS fixes now in place, all
the Linux and FreeBSD buildbots completed their build successfully,
On 02/04/2016 10:11 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>>
>> On 02/04/2016 06:05 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jochen Nitschke
>> wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:15:23 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> So
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2016 06:05 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jochen Nitschke
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:15:23 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> >>> So builds@ replied saying the buildbot was broken by an earl
On 02/04/2016 06:05 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jochen Nitschke wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:15:23 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> So builds@ replied saying the buildbot was broken by an earlier bad
>> commit
>>> (not mine) and should be working now, and
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jochen Nitschke wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:15:23 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > So builds@ replied saying the buildbot was broken by an earlier bad
> commit
> > (not mine) and should be working now, and it was, but I ended up needing
> to
> > commit another
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:15:23 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> So builds@ replied saying the buildbot was broken by an earlier bad commit
> (not mine) and should be working now, and it was, but I ended up needing to
> commit another patch (cydrive -> cygdrive typo in the path to "svn info").
> That 1
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:43 AM, j.nitsc...@ok.de wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:07:33 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> I think the latter is true: it's re-enteri
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:48:17 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> This still isn't working: I've changed
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/create-ooo-snapshots-index.sh
> but https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ind
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:43 AM, j.nitsc...@ok.de wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:07:33 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> > wrote:
>
> >> I think the latter is true: it's re-entering them because they broke the
> >> build.
> >>
> >> Yesterday jpeg fa
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Our build page https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/index.html is
>> > also
>> > messed up - eg.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:07:33 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi
I am to get our build bots working
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I am to get our build bots working again.
> > >
> > > So far I've committed a patch to fix
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I am to get our build bots working again.
> >
> > So far I've committed a patch to fix #126787 (build breaking regression
> in
> > main/sal due to and being include
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am to get our build bots working again.
>
> So far I've committed a patch to fix #126787 (build breaking regression in
> main/sal due to and being included) in r1727413, and
> deleted an unused empty file that the RAT scan was
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am to get our build bots working again.
>
> So far I've committed a patch to fix #126787 (build breaking regression in
> main/sal due to and being included) in r1727413, and
> deleted an unused empty file that the RAT scan was
Hi
I am to get our build bots working again.
So far I've committed a patch to fix #126787 (build breaking regression in
main/sal due to and being included) in r1727413, and
deleted an unused empty file that the RAT scan was treating as missing the
ASL in r1727463. The Windows aoo-win7 build bot
18 matches
Mail list logo
