Re: Dictionary en_GB - 2014-01-01 - Test version

2014-01-12 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 11/01/2014 Stuart Swales wrote: Pity we don't appear to have a history of the changes on the 'obfuscated' dictionary fork in Apache OOo to see what may have been lost by going back to the Mozilla version. There are issue links in the README files that Marco preserved. So the most important

Re: Re: Dictionary en_GB - 2014-01-01 - Test version

2014-01-11 Thread Alexandro Colorado
A few months back I help marco deal with this 'obfuscation', unfortuantely most of these data is actually garbage. Doing a deofuscation output a lot of nonsensical characters that seemed to be passed alone inflating the file unnecesarily. If you want to reproduce the process, just need to download

Re: Re: Dictionary en_GB - 2014-01-01 - Test version

2014-01-10 Thread Stuart Swales
+1. en_GB seems to work as expected. Pity we don't appear to have a history of the changes on the 'obfuscated' dictionary fork in Apache OOo to see what may have been lost by going back to the Mozilla version. On 10/01/2014 00:25, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 08/01/2014 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: >>

Re: Dictionary en_GB - 2014-01-01 - Test version

2014-01-09 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 08/01/2014 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: This OXT includes all English dictionaries as before, with only the en_GB updated. I was told to place an unpublished version of it and send the link to the DEV ML in order for people to test it for one week and give feedback. I insisted that Marco announced

Dictionary en_GB - 2014-01-01 - Test version

2014-01-08 Thread Marco A.G.Pinto
Hello! I am following Andrea's steps to try to release an updated version of the English (British) speller with over 800 unique words added by me (plus several dozens of derived words). This OXT includes all English dictionaries as before, with only the en