On 3 June 2015 at 16:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi jan, *
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:09:30AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> > Looking at other threads, it seems our Mac buildbots are in the process
> of
> > being
> > configured, does anybody have a planned ETA ?
>
> I have now access to the ma
Hi jan, *
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:09:30AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> Looking at other threads, it seems our Mac buildbots are in the process of
> being
> configured, does anybody have a planned ETA ?
I have now access to the machine (thanks a lot to Gavin!), but cannot
give you an ETA, though I'll
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/01/2015 12:09 AM, jan i wrote:
> > On 31 May 2015 at 18:43, Kay Schenk >
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>> On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
> On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >
On 06/01/2015 12:09 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 at 18:43, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
On 31 May 2015 at 18:43, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
> >> On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >>> Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
> >>> on CentOS 5?
> >> There was a dissension
Oh, I see ... thanks Kay for the link.
Ariel's two reasons are:
"a) Centos 5 will get Maintenance Updates until March 31st, 2017"
" b) this change should be done in a major version change, as it breaks
compatibility in client code".
About (a) .. Full updates ran off at Q1 2014. Does this mea
On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>> Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
>>> on CentOS 5?
>> There was a dissension. I did ask about the ramifications -- what
>> specifically
On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
on CentOS 5?
There was a dissension. I did ask about the ramifications -- what
specifically IS the issue to moving to CetnOS 6 -- but got no reply.
I thi
On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I started the discussion on dropping CentOS 5 and moving on
> to CentOS 6. There was no comment against moving to the
> newer version, which AFAICT is the last version to support
> 32 bits.
>
> Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there a
Hello;
I started the discussion on dropping CentOS 5 and moving on
to CentOS 6. There was no comment against moving to the
newer version, which AFAICT is the last version to support
32 bits.
Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
on CentOS 5?
Pedro.
On 29 May 2015 at 00:57, Kay Schenk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/15/2014 03:47 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:31:54PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/15/2014 03:47 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:31:54PM +0100, jan i wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot
>> for AOO) took a huge jump today, and are very near
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:56:31AM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >> I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to
> >> ver 5?
> >>
> >
> > It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our
> > commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it for Mac),
> > bu
On Friday, December 19, 2014, Michal Hriň wrote:
>
>
> Dňa 19.12.2014 o 01:18 Kay Schenk napísal(a):
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/2014 02:22 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> Michal Hriň wrote:
>>>
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> My main concern at this point is the a
Dňa 19.12.2014 o 01:18 Kay Schenk napísal(a):
On 12/18/2014 02:22 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Michal Hriň wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates
for this environment. I will be following up on a differen
On 12/18/2014 02:22 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Michal Hriň wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
> My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates
> for this environment. I will be following up on a different thread
> about
> this. .
Michal Hriň wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates
for this environment. I will be following up on a different thread about
this. ...
http://wiki.centos.org/Download
No need for a different thread, Michal'
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:46 Michal Hriň napísal(a):
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:20 jan i napísal(a):
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti >
wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:20 jan i napísal(a):
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti >
wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver
5?
It is our baseline (our reference platfor
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti >
> wrote:
> >
> > Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> >> I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver
> 5?
> >>
> >
> > It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
>
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5?
>>
>
> It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our
> commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it for Mac),
Kay Schenk wrote:
I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5?
It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our
commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it for Mac), but if
there are no strong technical reasons for doing it is should r
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
>
> On 16/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2014 at 18:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> Can we do something in parallel, like preparing a VM offline? And
>>> what format should it be in? These are probably stupid questions, but if
>>>
On 16/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On 16 December 2014 at 18:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Can we do something in parallel, like preparing a VM offline? And
what format should it be in? These are probably stupid questions, but if we
know that then we can look for help with clearer ideas.
Well assuming tet
On 16 December 2014 at 18:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> jan i wrote:
>
>> Now we have the next issue CentOS 5 versus CentOS 6. It is correct that
>> the
>> ticket is quite clear, so INFRA should have asked (and I dont know how
>> this
>> happened, at hipchat we actually discussed CentOS 5).
>>
>
jan i wrote:
Now we have the next issue CentOS 5 versus CentOS 6. It is correct that the
ticket is quite clear, so INFRA should have asked (and I dont know how this
happened, at hipchat we actually discussed CentOS 5).
I see it as a simple misunderstanding, nothing more: the discussion
about a
Hi
I should have foreseen it, the last couple of days have contained quite a
number of complaints in my inbox about the new centOS vm. A lot of the
complaints could have been answered with "please read the ticket and the
comments, before making a new comment", instead I have tried to patiently
ans
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
If we
agree that the best way is to put a modern, ASF-supported, Linux system
on tethys and then use it as a host for two virtualized buildbot
environments based on CentOS 5 (32 and 64 bit), let it be.
Adding some context: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6217
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
[arielch@bb-centos-vm ~]$ cat /etc/centos-release
CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
The Linux base requires a Centos 5 system
Sure it does. Probably the detail got lost months ago when Jan built
that VM.
Well, I think we now have the opportunity to explore options. If w
Hi all,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:31:54PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
> took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by the
> infra Contractors.
>
> Time to find somebody, that will install the AOO s
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:10:12PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> > It looks like you already have access, could you add access for me,
> > please? I'd like to help with this VM and the MacOSX set up.
> talk with arist about the MAC box.
I would have guessed that INFRA controls the access to this kind of
r
On 15 December 2014 at 15:29, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
>
> Hi Jan, *,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:06:01PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> > On 14 December 2014 at 18:40, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote:
> > >
> > >> That is due to the simple fact that this vm is not in
Hi Jan, *,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:06:01PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> On 14 December 2014 at 18:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >
> > On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote:
> >
> >> That is due to the simple fact that this vm is not in ldap nor does it run
> >> puppet, These are not mandatory (only makes life eas
jan i wrote:
On 14 December 2014 at 18:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
OK, so where do I login? I mean, I assume there is an account "pescetti"
on that machine and that my SSH key has been copied to it (based on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8768 ) but I have no idea of
what machine (FQ
On 14 December 2014 at 18:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>
>> That is due to the simple fact that this vm is not in ldap nor does it run
>> puppet, These are not mandatory (only makes life easier).
>>
>
> OK, so where do I login? I mean, I assume there is an account "pes
On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote:
That is due to the simple fact that this vm is not in ldap nor does it run
puppet, These are not mandatory (only makes life easier).
OK, so where do I login? I mean, I assume there is an account "pescetti"
on that machine and that my SSH key has been copied to it (ba
On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote:
>>>
FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
took a huge jump today, and
On 11/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote:
FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
took a huge jump today, and are very near completion.
Thanks for the news! Well, indeed it was almost impo
On 12/10/2014 03:35 PM, jan i wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
>>> took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by
>
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
> > took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by
> the
> > infra Contractors.
> >
> > Time to
On 12/09/2014 08:31 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
> took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by the
> infra Contractors.
>
> Time to find somebody, that will install the AOO specific buildbot parts.
>
Hi
FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot for AOO)
took a huge jump today, and are very near completion. This was done by the
infra Contractors.
Time to find somebody, that will install the AOO specific buildbot parts.
rgds
jan i.
42 matches
Mail list logo
