Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-02-06 Thread Dave Fisher
picks up these issues. Best, Dave > > Best, > Pedro > >>>> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> and a happy new year! >>>> >>>

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-02-06 Thread Pedro Lino
ime/interest to add those patches. Best, Pedro > >> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> and a happy new year! > >> > >> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in

AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 Community Builds Available for Testing and Fun

2024-02-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
We have community builds of AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 available for download and testing at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/ We encourage people to try these builds out and to provide feedback and PRs against them; These are NOT production ready! Heck, they aren't

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-02-04 Thread Dave Fisher
gt; Best, > Pedro > >> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> and a happy new year! >> >> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work >> towards a renewed Deve

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-02-03 Thread Pedro Lino
now work > towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. > > I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the > whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. > > Opinions? > > Regards, > >    Matthias

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-02-02 Thread Dave Fisher
We should not announce dev builds outside of this mailing list. They are in no way official and the intention is help the dev community in development. And this is great because that is what you both are doing. Thank you, Dave > On Feb 2, 2024, at 12:27 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi A

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-02-02 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi All, Am 30.01.24 um 17:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Jim, Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded. Great! I'll start on Linux32 bit b

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded. >> Great! > > I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today. > T

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded. > Great! I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today. >> >> Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release candidate

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-30 Thread Matthias Seidel
ielski: I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
s a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation >>>>>>>>> speed? >>>>>>>> I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need to check for ma

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-27 Thread Matthias Seidel
December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. Opinions? Regards,   Matthias I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good th

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help file

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-25 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. Opinions? Regards,

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
tion speed? >>>>>> I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system. >>>>>> >>>>>> We need to check for macOS/Linux now. >>>>>> >>>>>>> In any case, +1 to updating libraries >>>>

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-24 Thread Matthias Seidel
r doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the mas

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
;> >>>>> In any case, +1 to updating libraries >>>> That is the intention. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Pedro >>>>> >>>>>

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-15 Thread Matthias Seidel
in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. Opinions? Regards, Matthias I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thi

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-10 Thread Matthias Seidel
N. McKenna wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
t; > Regards, > >Matthias > >> >> Best, >> Pedro >> >>> Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS >>>> >>>>> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM,

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
newed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. Opinions? Regards, Matthias I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see movement on 4.2.0. Regards

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-09 Thread Pedro Lino
McKenna > >> wrote: > >> > >> Matthias Seidel wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> and a happy new year! > >>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work > >>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. >> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole >> translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. >> Opinions? >> Regards, >>Matthias > I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-07 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be postponed

AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

2024-01-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi All, and a happy new year! After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0. I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6. Opinions

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Feel free to do so... ;-) But I am not sure if Twitter is the right "audience" for a Developer Build. (BTW: I canceled my account there recently) Regards,    Matthias Am 27.12.22 um 12:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Should we post something on Twitter about Dev4 availability? > >> On Dec

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Should we post something on Twitter about Dev4 availability? > On Dec 25, 2022, at 4:03 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, All, > > Merry Christmas to all around here! > > Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded... > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb M

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-25 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, All, Merry Christmas to all around here! Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded... Regards,    Matthias Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Great! > > I am rebuilding now for Windows. > > Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep > everything

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Great! I am rebuilding now for Windows. Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep everything at #18ec844f88. Can you please tag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X then. Regards,    Matthias Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Yep! Just fin

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yep! Just finished building and uploading! > On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful? > > I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev. > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 22

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful? I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev. Regards,    Matthias Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes > are in

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path. > On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if > code changes are needed? >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-22 Thread Matthias Seidel
OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if code changes are needed? Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get > AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve > t

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve these issues. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
My macOS Catalina build server VM is very unreliable... working on getting it back in shape. > On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > > Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-22 Thread Matthias Seidel
Windows builds (a46cde238b) are uploaded now: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev4/binaries/ Regards,    Matthias Am 21.12.22 um 14:11 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > Thanks, my Windows build

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-21 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will probably upload before me! ;-) I think we should also hash the builds as we have done for Dev3, since they are semi-official. Regards,    Matthias > >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-21 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi jim, Am 21.12.22 um 12:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > No changes to the Linux or Windows builds, so the small change in hash# isn't > an issue since this is an informal Dev4 test So how do we tag it? Uploads go here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev4/binaries/ I wil

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
No changes to the Linux or Windows builds, so the small change in hash# isn't an issue since this is an informal Dev4 test > On Dec 20, 2022, at 8:39 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts > AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? > >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 20.12.22 um 14:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts > AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? Should have done git pull first... ;-) #a46cde238b Matthias > > Regards, > >    Matthias > > Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> T

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? Regards,    Matthias Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: > > https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ macOS builds are on-going

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Had to reboot the VM... > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > failed to download > https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download > at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line > 519. > > Hmmm > >> On

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
failed to download https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 519. Hmmm > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this wee

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week > On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > I have some free time next week. > > How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ? Sorry, since we want to build AOO

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-12-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. I have some free time next week. How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ? Regards,    Matthias > >> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >>

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-11 Thread Pedro Lino
I can't get 4.2.X to build in Ubuntu 18.04.6 x64 I'm using ./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" --with-dmake-url=https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz --with-epm-url=https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0/epm-5.0.0.tar.gz

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-09 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias So, at that time we build from the source contained in the archive (aka tag)? That makes sense! Thanks! Pedro > On 11/08/2022 9:32 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi Matthias > > > >> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matth

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro, Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > >> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. >> No need to wait, you can always build your own version. > Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias > On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > > I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. > > No need to wait, you can always build your own version. Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). But the idea was to do th

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Pedro, Am 07.11.22 um 15:30 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > > +1 > I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. No need to wait, you can always build your own version. Regards,    Matthias > > Best, > Pedro > >> On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. I hope that others have something to contribute. Otherwise Dev4 will be just "another" snapshot. But even then, we can prepare Dev5 afterwards. Step by step to the 4.2.0 relea

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, all, > > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. > > I will use these two g

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-08 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, all, Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/ > Is HEAD of AOO42X in

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-07 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Matthias, all +1 I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04. Best, Pedro > On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago. > Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? > > Regarding Windows, I would like

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be added before we build? > On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago. >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-06 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, We released our last Developer version some time ago. Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as a "Developer Version". This way we are much closer to a production build. Additionally, I would like to bu

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-06 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, We released our last Developer version some time ago. Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as a "Developer Version". This way we are much closer to a production build. Additionally, I would like to bu

Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

2022-11-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, We released our last Developer version some time ago. Maybe we can start a Dev4 now? Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as a "Developer Version". This way we are much closer to a production build. Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums Op

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

2021-08-15 Thread Delio Orozco Gonzalez
Hello Matthias: I use IceWM 2.6.0 and Budgie 10.5.2 Regards, Delio. - Mensaje original - De: "Matthias Seidel" Para: "dev" Enviados: Sábado, 14 de Agosto 2021 17:52:15 Asunto: Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9 Hi Delio, Which Desktop Environment are you using w

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

2021-08-14 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Delio, Which Desktop Environment are you using with Debian? Regards,    Matthias Am 14.08.21 um 17:23 schrieb Delio Orozco Gonzalez: > Hi all, > > I installed 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9 and until the moment there are not bug > . > > Regards, Delio. > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Crypt

AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

2021-08-14 Thread Delio Orozco Gonzalez
Hi all, I installed 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9 and until the moment there are not bug . Regards, Delio.

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-19 Thread Don Lewis
On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 19.05.20 um 19:44 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, all, >>> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seide

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, Am 19.05.20 um 19:44 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, all, >> >> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 01:2

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-19 Thread Don Lewis
On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, all, > > Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: > Looks like someone applied this p

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, all, Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: --- solenv/g

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-18 Thread Don Lewis
On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: >>> >>> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig 2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC >>> +++ sole

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-18 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: >> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: >> >> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig 2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC >> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(st

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-18 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: > > Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: > > --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig 2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC > +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1) > $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-17 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 15.05.20 um 21:30 schrieb Don Lewis: >> >> Nope. I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late >> January using gmake 4.3. > > Have there been significant changes to the build system in the past 4 month? > Maybe you could try it wi

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-16 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, Am 15.05.20 um 21:30 schrieb Don Lewis: > > Nope. I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late > January using gmake 4.3. Have there been significant changes to the build system in the past 4 month? Maybe you could try it with a more recent revision... Regards,    Matthi

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-15 Thread Don Lewis
On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 15.05.20 um 17:14 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime,

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-15 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, Am 15.05.20 um 17:14 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-15 Thread Don Lewis
On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) >>> Thanks, I think we need it for A

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-15 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Don, Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or >>> later) >> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too. >> >> At least I had to downgrade

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-15 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) > > Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too. > > At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin... gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere. FreeBS

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, I think we are complete? Am 13.05.20 um 19:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in... > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Gotcha... before I do it I'll try w/ 4.3.0 and see if there are any diffs between the makefiles > On May 11, 2020, at 5:58 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) > > Thanks,

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too. At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin... > > - > To unsubscr

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
According to the gmake 4.3 release docs: * WARNING: Backward-incompatibility! Number signs (#) appearing inside a macro reference or function invocation no longer introduce comments and should not be escaped with backslashes: thus a call such as: foo := $(shell echo '#') is legal. Pre

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thanks I see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128373 now. this needs to be fixed before our next release :/ > On May 11, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It is, yes. >

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2

2020-05-11 Thread Peter Kovacs
Am 11.05.20 um 22:04 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: It is, yes. Downgrade to 4.2. That should fix it. The same on Linux and Windows (Cygwin) I am telling it to this list for weeks now... ;-) Nobody knows the trouble I have seen. cppumaker does create so

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > It is, yes. Downgrade to 4.2. That should fix it. The same on Linux and Windows (Cygwin) I am telling it to this list for weeks now... ;-) > >> On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Let me guess... >> >> make is updated to 4.

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
It is, yes. > On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Let me guess... > > make is updated to 4.3? > > Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on >> macOS): >> >> = >> Building module

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Let me guess... make is updated to 4.3? Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on > macOS): > > = > Building module offapi > = > > Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj > > cd .. &

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on macOS): = Building module offapi = Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj cd .. && make -s -r -j6 && make -s -r deliverlog [ build RDB ] offapi [ build HPP ] offapi [ build CHK ] loa

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 11.05.20 um 20:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Tag is done: > > 420-Dev2-m2 > > Kicking off builds Great! Do you build the 5 additional languages? > >> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> 420-Dev2-m2 > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tag is done: 420-Dev2-m2 Kicking off builds > On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > 420-Dev2-m2

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 11.05.20 um 16:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch > as 420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux > 32&64 and macOS builds. I am on standby for the Windows builds... ;-) > -

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch as 420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux 32&64 and macOS builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa

AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

2020-05-04 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Mechtilde, Jim, @Mechtilde: French help seems to make some problems (spaces in XML tags). We must check that again. @Jim: I would like to do a complete dev build on Windows to see if all languages are OK. Regards,    Matthias Am 03.05.20 um 22:02 schrieb Mechtilde: > +1 > > Am 03.05.20 um 1

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

2019-10-25 Thread Matthias Seidel
t;>>>>>>> That would save me a lot of my spare time... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>&

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

2019-10-01 Thread Matthias Seidel
t; That would save me a lot of my spare time... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>&g

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

2019-10-01 Thread Marcus
ailable in 32 bit, which is still needed for Windows [1]. I am just doing a build for AOO 4.2.0 with AdaptOpenJDK (8u222) and it looks good so far... What do you think? Regards,     Matthias [1] https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8&jvmVariant=hotspot#x32_win

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

2019-10-01 Thread Matthias Seidel
gt;>>> Windows with >>>>>>> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221). >>>>>>> I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing. I >>>>>>> am not >>>>>>> a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it. &g

  1   2   3   >