Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:19:32 +0200
>>> From: Andrea Pescetti
>>> To: Henk P. Penning
>>> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:19:32 +0200
>> From: Andrea Pescetti
>> To: Henk P. Penning
>> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: 4.0.1 r
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:19:32 +0200
From: Andrea Pescetti
To: Henk P. Penning
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.
Everything was OK in the 4.0 case.
No. Regarding the mirrors, it was not ok.
Fact
On 03/09/2013 Henk P. Penning wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So, in short, if this can be done in a way that does not slow down the
post-approval upload period from 2 days to 7 days, fine; otherwise, it
is better to repeat what was done for 4.0: within 2 days binaries on
SF ..
On 3 September 2013 08:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 sebb wrote:
>>
>> Are you suggesting pointing users to the archives for current sigs and
>> hashes?
>> If so, I don't think that's a good idea.
>
>
> Maybe it isn't, but using dist is worse:
> - Everything that lives on dist is temp
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 23:45:06 +0200
From: Andrea Pescetti
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Henk P. Penning
Subject: Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.
On 01/09/2013 Henk P. Penning wrote:
For 4.0.0 I added the binaries slowly ; some 4 to 5
On 03/09/2013 sebb wrote:
Are you suggesting pointing users to the archives for current sigs and hashes?
If so, I don't think that's a good idea.
Maybe it isn't, but using dist is worse:
- Everything that lives on dist is temporary
- You end up with tons on liks to update (and some cannot reall
On 2 September 2013 22:45, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/09/2013 Henk P. Penning wrote:
>>
>> For 4.0.0 I added the binaries slowly ; some 4 to 5 languages
>> a day is what the rsync servers can handle. So, it takes 5 days
>> for the quick mirrors plus 2 days for the straglers. Note that
>> there
On 01/09/2013 Henk P. Penning wrote:
For 4.0.0 I added the binaries slowly ; some 4 to 5 languages
a day is what the rsync servers can handle. So, it takes 5 days
for the quick mirrors plus 2 days for the straglers. Note that
there are some sites that are still trying to catch up.
Soon after GA
On 2 September 2013 09:26, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/1/13 4:45 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 1 September 2013 15:31, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI wrote:
On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding ou
On 9/1/13 4:45 PM, janI wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 15:31, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI wrote:
>>> On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
>>>
Hi.
I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release.
Sync on mirrors takes
On 1 September 2013 14:31, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI wrote:
>> On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release.
>>>
>>> Sync on mirrors takes about a week, and the mirror can in general
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Rob Weir wrote:
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:31:37 +0200
From: Rob Weir
To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
Cc: janI , Henk P. Penning
Subject: Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI wrote:
On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
On 1 September 2013 15:31, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI wrote:
> > On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release.
> >>
> >> Sync on mirrors takes about a week, and the mirror can in
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release.
>>
>> Sync on mirrors takes about a week, and the mirror can in general not hold
>> 4.0 and 4.0.1
>>
Is this a change? The
On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release.
>
> Sync on mirrors takes about a week, and the mirror can in general not hold
> 4.0 and 4.0.1
>
> Therefore the current suggestion is to
> a) remove 4.0 from mirrors GA - 1wee
Hi.
I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release.
Sync on mirrors takes about a week, and the mirror can in general not hold
4.0 and 4.0.1
Therefore the current suggestion is to
a) remove 4.0 from mirrors GA - 1week = 12 september
b) update 4.0.1 to mirrors GA = 19 sept
17 matches
Mail list logo
