Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-13 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:37:23PM +0100, jan iversen wrote: > The utilities as such are standalone (l10n tools). it works if I set the > commandline options correct for the linker, so it is not a generic platform > issue. It is just a "pain in the neck" problem, when you try to make the > program

Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-13 Thread jan iversen
The utilities as such are standalone (l10n tools). it works if I set the commandline options correct for the linker, so it is not a generic platform issue. It is just a "pain in the neck" problem, when you try to make the program easy supportable. The source cannot be ported to java because it is

Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-13 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, jan iversen wrote: > Hi Andre. > > What I find "funny" is that in Ubuntu, I dont even get a warning about > multiple declared symbols in windows I get the warnings but it works (with > /force:multiple), so I will just overwrite the linker options in the > makefile

Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-12 Thread jan iversen
Hi Andre. What I find "funny" is that in Ubuntu, I dont even get a warning about multiple declared symbols in windows I get the warnings but it works (with /force:multiple), so I will just overwrite the linker options in the makefile, that should do it. Thanks for your help. Jan. Ps. The flex pe

Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-12 Thread Andre Fischer
On 12.11.2012 14:02, jan iversen wrote: hi see below please On 12 November 2012 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote: On 11.11.2012 22:06, jan iversen wrote: Hi. I would like to hear your opinion on the following problem: The l10n tools uses flex, which is quite nice, however I have found two prob

Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-12 Thread jan iversen
hi see below please On 12 November 2012 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 11.11.2012 22:06, jan iversen wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I would like to hear your opinion on the following problem: >> >> The l10n tools uses flex, which is quite nice, however I have found two >> problems with flex: >> >> - t

Re: [question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-12 Thread Andre Fischer
On 11.11.2012 22:06, jan iversen wrote: Hi. I would like to hear your opinion on the following problem: The l10n tools uses flex, which is quite nice, however I have found two problems with flex: - the .l sources defines YYLMAX, but the generated .c source declares yytext[YYLMAX] BEFORE the de

[question] flex and shortcoming

2012-11-11 Thread jan iversen
Hi. I would like to hear your opinion on the following problem: The l10n tools uses flex, which is quite nice, however I have found two problems with flex: - the .l sources defines YYLMAX, but the generated .c source declares yytext[YYLMAX] BEFORE the definition code it sucked in. I have verifie