Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/24/2014 12:16 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus (OOo) wrote: However, I don't know why we should keep a large table with links when the whole functionality now existing in the greeen download box. If the approach by Emanuele yields (this is the impression I got from the Github code) a

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Marcus (OOo) wrote: However, I don't know why we should keep a large table with links when the whole functionality now existing in the greeen download box. If the approach by Emanuele yields (this is the impression I got from the Github code) a pure HTML output, not depending on JS, and can be

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/23/2014 11:34 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 07/23/2014 12:17 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/23/2014 02:34 PM, schrieb Emanuele: Kay Schenk wrote: Do to recent updates to the download logic /download/other.html still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no longer re

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/23/2014 11:42 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado: On 7/23/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On 7/23/14, Emanuele wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: It would be better if you use the site to show it. I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an almost exact copy of the ta

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On 7/23/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On 7/23/14, Emanuele wrote: >> >> Alexandro Colorado wrote: >>> It would be better if you use the site to show it. >> >> I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an >> almost exact copy of the table you already know (provided you have

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Kay Schenk
On 07/23/2014 12:17 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/23/2014 02:34 PM, schrieb Emanuele: >> Kay Schenk wrote: >>> Do to recent updates to the download logic >>> >>> /download/other.html >>> >>> still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no >>> longer >>> renders. >>> >>> Acc

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On 7/23/14, Emanuele wrote: > > Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> It would be better if you use the site to show it. > > I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an > almost exact copy of the table you already know (provided you have > javascript enabled), only in "pure" HTML (no

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/23/2014 02:34 PM, schrieb Emanuele: Kay Schenk wrote: Do to recent updates to the download logic /download/other.html still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no longer renders. According to our Google Analytics, this page has quite a number of references, inclu

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Emanuele
Alexandro Colorado wrote: > It would be better if you use the site to show it. I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an almost exact copy of the table you already know (provided you have javascript enabled), only in "pure" HTML (no javascript required). The difference is

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Alexandro Colorado
It would be better if you use the site to show it. That said, the reason for the table is because we werent that open to use Javascript. We would still argue that we have a code. Regardless if its XML, JSON or HTML or even a bash script to autogenerate the HTML from a sqlite datasource. On 7/23

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-23 Thread Emanuele
Kay Schenk wrote: > Do to recent updates to the download logic > > /download/other.html > > still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no longer > renders. > > According to our Google Analytics, this page has quite a number of > references, including using it as a convenient

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-20 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/20/2014 11:58 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > Do to recent updates to the download logic >> >> /download/other.html >> >> still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no >> longer >> renders. >> > > ah, thanks. I've fi

Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-20 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/20/2014 11:58 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Do to recent updates to the download logic /download/other.html still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no longer renders. ah, thanks. I've fixed this. Reason is the recent change to use the variable names as object proper

[WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html

2014-07-20 Thread Kay Schenk
Do to recent updates to the download logic /download/other.html still exists as an entity but its basically blank since the table no longer renders. According to our Google Analytics, this page has quite a number of references, including using it as a convenient way to show what languages we hav