Alexandro Colorado wrote: > It would be better if you use the site to show it.
I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an almost exact copy of the table you already know (provided you have javascript enabled), only in "pure" HTML (no javascript required). The difference is that it is generated while building the site, and being the generation the point of my comment, I published only that part. > That said, the reason for the table is because we werent that open to > use Javascript. We would still argue that we have a <noscript> code. > > Regardless if its XML, JSON or HTML or even a bash script to > autogenerate the HTML from a sqlite datasource. Not sure what you want to say here: is it fine with you to use js? Then it's fine with me as well. ;-) Emanuele --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
