there.
Six months ago I posted this [1] on qa@ and cc'd this list about the
work and haven't got any negative feedback so far.
Since this is a larger architectural issue that may affect someone who
runs the test suites after a build with some sort of scripts I wanted to
discuss it.
As I don
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:44 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
Hi
I want to get some opinions on whether to merge my work on standalone
> test automation into trunk and possibly AOO42X and AOO41X or leave it in
> a branch and use it from there.
> Six months ago I posted this
Hi All,
I want to get some opinions on whether to merge my work on standalone
test automation into trunk and possibly AOO42X and AOO41X or leave it in
a branch and use it from there.
Six months ago I posted this [1] on qa@ and cc'd this list about the
work and haven't got an
> -Original Message-
> From: MENGUAL Jean-Philippe [mailto:mengualjean...@free.fr]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 9:27 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Peter Kovacs
> Subject: Re: QA automatisation in AOO
>
> Hi,
>
> I am developing an infra
Hi Peter and All,
On 10/24/21 2:47 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
On 24.10.21 20:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: QA automatisation in AOO
Hello
Hi!
On 24.10.21 21:27, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
Hi,
I am developing an infra for QA. Initially aimed for accessibility, I
think the whole community can use this: they are based on Dogtail and
track events from at-spi, on Linux, that enables to see if a key press
or a mouse mouvement has
Hi,
I am developing an infra for QA. Initially aimed for accessibility, I
think the whole community can use this: they are based on Dogtail and
track events from at-spi, on Linux, that enables to see if a key press
or a mouse mouvement has the appropriate feedback from an event point of
view
Hi,
On 24.10.21 20:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: QA automatisation in AOO
Hello all,
In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: QA automatisation in AOO
>
> Hello all,
>
> In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg ha
Hello all,
In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask about how we could
improve QA.
The only way in general is to formalize. We need to define testcases and
automate those.
There are 2 ways of Automation:
1) is through Code
2) is through GUI.
Today both can be automated.
@1
Am 30.09.21 um 04:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Just an FYI on the status of my work on allowing the automated test
suites to compile and run tests without a working AOO build environment.
I've started a new branch standalone-test [1] with a README file
explaining the usage.
[...]
thanks for your
Hi All,
cc: dev@
Just an FYI on the status of my work on allowing the automated test
suites to compile and run tests without a working AOO build environment.
I've started a new branch standalone-test [1] with a README file
explaining the usage.
So far I've been able to run tests on CentOS 7
Hi All,
For those that run the automated tests after a build.
I wrote a Groovy macro to import the XML results from JUnit into Calc as
another option besides the HTML reports.
A short video on it's use and where to get it.
https://youtu.be/mpC6gNUuWCY
Please let me know if you have any quest
Hi Peter
> On 10/29/2020 10:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> How about creating an automated manual test RPA robot as a GSoC?
>
> Just a wild idea.
I think that if one of the people reading this email today knows how to fix
this (and has the time/urge to scratch this itch) then it is better
How about creating an automated manual test RPA robot as a GSoC?
Just a wild idea.
Am 28. Oktober 2020 22:42:11 MEZ schrieb Andrea Pescetti :
>Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> Maybe the following link helps?
>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
>
>Indeed
Peter Kovacs wrote:
Maybe the following link helps?
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
Indeed, this section
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
seems to contain at least some of the recent (2012) testcases. So one
could use this as a basis if we want to
Hi Damjan,
On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately.
I have a few questions:
1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests
provide vs.fu
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately.
> I have a few questions:
>
> 1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests
> provide vs.functionality?
>
> 2. Is there yet a place to list
Hi Andrea,
On 10/27/20 5:58 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which
I don't think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it s
Maybe the following link helps?
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
Kay did migrate stuff in 2018 I think. Maybe went a bit unnoticed?
Is this what the Server had contained?
Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is
Hi Andrea,
Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which
>> I don't think we use anymore
>
> Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which I don't
think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it should serve as a lesson: Adfinis contributed
a server
cc dev@
I thought I'd try out the tests on Jim's test9 build from last night
that had the General Error thrown to see if it got picked up and it did.
Sometimes I'll get a few false failures or errors on different runs
(working on getting a list of them to fix) but it's usually 0 -2 so I'm
pr
a lot that could be done in this area to attract new
contributors if we had a place to work from.
Both in documenting and work on some flaky tests that I've run into.
I'm willing to put some effort into this, both organizing and developing.
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro pag
Attached is the QA report for my testing on AOO 4.1.8 0c0e82a55d.
Regards
Keith
Verification of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 Rev 0c0e82a55d
System Configuration:
Processor: Intel Pentium CPU 4450U @2.10GHz
Installed Memory: 8.00 GB
System Type 64-bit Operating System X64-based processor
Operating
Hi,
Am 03.10.20 um 15:52 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Czeslaw, Matthias
>
>> Yes we can agree that the problem of two checkboxes placed over another is
>> fixed.
> Agreed! After installing 4.1.7 I can see that the reported bug has indeed
> been fixed.
>
> When 4.1.8 is released then it will make sens
Hi Czeslaw, Matthias
> Yes we can agree that the problem of two checkboxes placed over another is
> fixed.
Agreed! After installing 4.1.7 I can see that the reported bug has indeed been
fixed.
When 4.1.8 is released then it will make sense to request additional
improvements (that hopefully wil
Hi,
Yes we can agree that the problem of two checkboxes placed over another is
fixed.
As for opening a new ticket...
"In due course. In the fullness of time.
At the appropriate juncture. When the moment is ripe.
When the requisite procedures have been completed.
Nothing precipitate." (from "Yes M
Hi,
Am 03.10.20 um 13:22 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi Matthias, Pedro
>
> @Matthias
>> BTW: You personally found that problem
>> and we had a long discussion about it.
>> I only found the Bugzilla issue afterwards... ;-)
>>
> Now I remember. One of those cases falling under § 20 StGB (on my p
Hi Matthias, Pedro
@Matthias
>
> BTW: You personally found that problem
> and we had a long discussion about it.
> I only found the Bugzilla issue afterwards... ;-)
>
Now I remember. One of those cases falling under § 20 StGB (on my part). ;-)
Thank you!
What Pedro pointed out is exactly my
Hi Pedro,
Am 03.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 10/03/2020 11:36 AM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Regarding issue 83432: Just look at the dialog in AOO 4.1.7 and you see
>> what was fixed...
> Czeslaw is right. This is still not fixed. Both Default check boxes should
> load
Hi Matthias
> On 10/03/2020 11:36 AM Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Regarding issue 83432: Just look at the dialog in AOO 4.1.7 and you see
> what was fixed...
Czeslaw is right. This is still not fixed. Both Default check boxes should load
unchecked (because you can initially modify the value).
Onc
Hi Czesław,
Thanks for testing!
Regarding issue 83432: Just look at the dialog in AOO 4.1.7 and you see
what was fixed...
BTW: You personally found that problem and we had a long discussion
about it. I only found the Bugzilla issue afterwards... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
Am 03.10.20 um 08:38 s
The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LeMp68yqcUyZb5s33Ul1p1d1QAbos6Hb/view?usp=sharing
Regards
Czesław Wolański
Hi Keith,
Am 26.09.20 um 22:39 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/26/2020 2:54 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> I just did an administrative install on Windows 10.
>>
>> Extract the package, open cmd.exe move to the OpenOffice folder and do
>> "setup.exe /a"
>> Unless you are talking ab
On 9/26/2020 2:54 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> I just did an administrative install on Windows 10.
>
> Extract the package, open cmd.exe move to the OpenOffice folder and do
> "setup.exe /a"
> Unless you are talking about something different?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
Hi Mat
of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
>>>>> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>> Attached pleas find the results of my QA testing for ver
can be downloaded from the following link:
>>>> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>> Attached pleas find the results of my QA testing for version 4.1.8
>>> Revision
/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>
>> Attached pleas find the results of my QA testing for version 4.1.8
>> Revision 2b2dfb9831.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> Regarding "Issue 125696 Remove information from Help o
/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>
>> Attached pleas find the results of my QA testing for version 4.1.8
>> Revision 2b2dfb9831.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> Regarding "Issue 125696 Remove information from Help o
Hi Keith,
Am 24.09.20 um 17:33 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 8/23/2020 1:35 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
>> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>>
>
On 8/23/2020 1:35 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
Attached pleas find the results of my QA testing for version 4.1.8
Revision 2b2dfb98
Hi Keith,
Am 24.08.20 um 00:02 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> Hi Matthias;
> On 8/23/2020 1:51 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Am 23.08.20 um 19:35 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
>>> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-
Hi Matthias;
On 8/23/2020 1:51 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Am 23.08.20 um 19:35 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
>> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
>
> Thanks for testing
You are very welcome, we need
Hi Matthias, Don, all
> Regarding update check, my latest builds have updated openSSL:
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-418-Test/
Just tested your AOO418m1(Build:9801) - Rev. 2b2dfb9831 under Windows 7 Pro
x64
AOO and extension updates work as expected!
In addition editing fi
Hi Keith,
Am 23.08.20 um 19:35 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
> https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
Thanks for testing!
Regarding "Noto CJK font", I downloaded this one from Google:
https://noto-website-2.storage.goog
The results of my testing can be downloaded from the following link:
https://1drv.ms/t/s!AsMYmStvrJNJixd-w2GbfJt6h9S5
Regards
Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 02.04.19 um 19:01 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:24 PM Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> Just for clarification, these tests are done automatically while
>> building unless I disable them explicitly with --disable-unit-tests?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:24 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Just for clarification, these tests are done automatically while
> building unless I disable them explicitly with --disable-unit-tests?
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
That's right.
Regards
Damjan
tools/Module_tools.mk
> openoffice/trunk/main/tools/qa/test_pathutils.cxx
>
> Added: openoffice/trunk/main/tools/GoogleTest_tools_pathutils.mk
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trun
what can be done as interest QA?
All the Best
Peter
On 9/6/18 5:20 AM, sharmistha guha wrote:
Hi,
I am a QA engineer and would like to contribute to Apache projects. I have
4 years of QA experience.
Please let me know how I can be of help to Apache projects.
Thanks
Sharmis
Hi,
I am a QA engineer and would like to contribute to Apache projects. I have
4 years of QA experience.
Please let me know how I can be of help to Apache projects.
Thanks
Sharmistha Guha.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Peter Kovacs
Date: Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:53 PM
Subject: Re
ksch...@apache.org:
>>> Author: kschenk
>>> Date: Thu Jul 12 19:26:24 2018
>>> New Revision: 1835769
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835769&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Commit new index files
>>>
>>>
>
Jul 12 19:26:24 2018
> New Revision: 1835769
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835769&view=rev
> Log:
> Commit new index files
>
>
> Added:
>
> openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/Impress/AddorRemoveAnimationEffects/index
Sorry for the noise about this. I will replacing all the test cases I
uploaded a week ago with renamed ones that include the original AOOTest-xxx
name from TestLink. So, if you're working on any of these, my apologies.
The test case area:
http://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting
alExecution.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
Hi Keith --
I followed the instructions I posted on the QA list In February --
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fdca925316308fda4f4faed31276f79c4e48baf4badea8842f452f4d@%3Cqa.openoffice.apache.org%3E
The "browse cases" give you
On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess.
> Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that
> this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what we're missing and
> want to have at this point.
On 4/2/2018 8:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess.
>> Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that
>> this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what
On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess.
> Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that
> this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what we're missing and
> want to have at this point.
>
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> On 4/2/2018 6:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mcke...@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>
On 4/2/2018 6:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index"
>> capability
>>> of the new
a followup, see below...
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > I've committed changes to the QA are
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index"
> capability
> > of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to th
On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" capability
> of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the QA
> area over the next few days before a general announcement to QA.
&g
html files display correctly when
you click on them. Right off hand, I don't know how to do what you're
suggesting with just setting HTTPD + Indexes option. :( Maybe someone
else does?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 30, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I've committed ch
7;ve committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" capability
> of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the QA
> area over the next few days before a general announcement to QA.
>
> NOTE: the staging web site -- http://ooo-site.sta
I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" capability
of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the QA
area over the next few days before a general announcement to QA.
NOTE: the staging web site -- http://ooo-site.staging.apach
Hi -
I agree and wrote the same on a different thread the other day.
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 24, 2017, at 3:28 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> Hi Raphael, all
>
>> I believe the 4.1.4 shows us, that we have to do a better job in QA. A
>> minor release should never go to a rc
Hi Raphael, all
> I believe the 4.1.4 shows us, that we have to do a better job in QA. A
> minor release should never go to a rc5. I believe we all (and I pointing
> my finger to myself) underestimated the regression risk at the 4.1.4.
+1
> So, to do a better job in the 4.2.0 I
elopers in the
security team, so that they can have access to unreleased security fixes.
On 10/23/2017 8:45 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi all,
I believe the 4.1.4 shows us, that we have to do a better job in QA. A
minor release should never go to a rc5. I believe we all (and I pointing
my
Hi all,
I believe the 4.1.4 shows us, that we have to do a better job in QA. A
minor release should never go to a rc5. I believe we all (and I pointing
my finger to myself) underestimated the regression risk at the 4.1.4.
So, to do a better job in the 4.2.0 I propose the following changes
Hi at all
Am 11/17/2016 um 11:19 PM schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hello Abhishek,
On 14/11/16 19:34, Abhishek Mehendale wrote:
Hey Team,
Can somebody Help me with TestLink? Can anybody add me on TestLink
project for doing manual testing?
Sorry for the delay in answering. I'm afraid nobody
try find out, and let you know.
> I can do some manual testing on my Mac OS.
That would be great.
@dev: Does anyone know the status of the test link instance, how has
admin access, etc.?
See http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php
and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Testlink
Re
fice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [QA] Testlink Guest Account
>
> Great questions!
>
> 1. We don't assign test cases to people, generally. Generally, QA
> contributors select bugzilla issues and assign to themselves as QA
> person so that others know someone has raised t
Great questions!
1. We don't assign test cases to people, generally. Generally, QA
contributors select bugzilla issues and assign to themselves as QA person so
that others know someone has raised their hand.
2.There has not been any updating of TestLink since 2014-08-15 and the l
On 03/30/2016 02:24 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I've made some improvements to our QA tests and would appreciate some
ideas and feedback.
In r1737135 I committed further changes to build.xml that make passing
the long and painful -Dopenoffice.home=... parameter to ant
unnecessary
Hi
I've made some improvements to our QA tests and would appreciate some
ideas and feedback.
In r1737135 I committed further changes to build.xml that make passing
the long and painful -Dopenoffice.home=... parameter to ant
unnecessary - if absent, it autodetects it using the .set.sh
tha
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> After a few of my fixes in SVN trunk, our bvt QA tests are now all passing
> :-).
>
> The bvt.gui.BasicFunctionTest.testSlideShow test passes on 4.1.2 on
> Linux, but fails on trunk on FreeBSD which
Am 03/04/2016 04:09 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
+1 Test early, test often.
I see it the same way.
Marcus
On 3/4/2016 6:30 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Damjan;
Running tests in the buildbots is always a good idea.
Best regards,
Pedro.
ps. the FreeBSD buildbot appears to still be brok
+1 Test early, test often.
On 3/4/2016 6:30 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Damjan;
Running tests in the buildbots is always a good idea.
Best regards,
Pedro.
ps. the FreeBSD buildbot appears to still be broken with the
downloading issue.
Hi Damjan;
Running tests in the buildbots is always a good idea.
Best regards,
Pedro.
ps. the FreeBSD buildbot appears to still be broken with the
downloading issue.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache
Hi
After a few of my fixes in SVN trunk, our bvt QA tests are now all passing :-).
The bvt.gui.BasicFunctionTest.testSlideShow test passes on 4.1.2 on
Linux, but fails on trunk on FreeBSD which also has the manually
reproducible problem where Impress documents - at least with a
rectangle added
Hello Dolores,
it's pleasant, that you will support our QA.
Confirming new defect reports and verifying fixed defects are important
task to improve our Free Office Suite.
Kind regards
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ice.apache.org/orientation/how-aoo-project-works.html>
-
Level 2: Decision Making
<http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/decision-making.html> and Making
sense of Project's Technical Infrastructure
<http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/infrastructure.html>
Now i w
>>> that error)
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Damjan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello --
>>>>
>>>> Currently, I am having problems building d
re options
>> * the compile log from earlier on (containing the command run that produces
>> that error)
>>
>> Thank you
>> Damjan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> Hello --
>>>
>
d run that produces
> that error)
>
> Thank you
> Damjan
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Hello --
>>
>> Currently, I am having problems building due to some recent changes in
>> sal/qa/osl/
>>
>>
&
Compilation before the error attached --
>
> Thank you
> Damjan
>
Thanks for looking into this. I may not be able to get back to it for a
couple of days.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > Hello --
> >
> > Curren
15 at 11:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Hello --
>
> Currently, I am having problems building due to some recent changes in
> sal/qa/osl/
>
>
> sal/qa/osl/thread/test_thread.cxx seems to be successfully compiled but on
> making qa_osl_thread, I am getting the following errors --
Hello --
Currently, I am having problems building due to some recent changes in
sal/qa/osl/
sal/qa/osl/thread/test_thread.cxx seems to be successfully compiled but on
making qa_osl_thread, I am getting the following errors --
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsalcpprt
collect2: ld returned 1 exit
Although of specific importance for QA, this deserves awareness and
consideration in the boarder dev community. Sorry, I was focused too narrowly,
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 08:29
To: q
Lalitha Ramprasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I joined openoffice QA list a few months back. I was asked to subscribe to
> dev@openoffice.apache.org to get posts on issues. I'm new to QA and it
> would be helpful if you could add me into this group.
>
> Thankyou,
> Lalitha
&g
Hi,
I joined openoffice QA list a few months back. I was asked to subscribe to
dev@openoffice.apache.org to get posts on issues. I'm new to QA and it
would be helpful if you could add me into this group.
Thankyou,
Lalitha
Welcome, hope that you have a great experience working with the
community and also feel free to get your students to join in. There is
no age limit on how users can contribute to the community, from
localization, to quality assurance to coding, this community has
everything to learn and share knowl
Hello, friends!
My name is Artem Khmelyov. I am a teacher of Computer Science. I live in Kyiv,
Ukraine (East Europe). I like IT and I hope that I will come to your big
friendly team.
Good Luck!
--
Best Regards
Artem Khmelyov
---
On 9/15/2014 2:11 PM, Andrew wrote:
> Hi there, My name is Andrew Chaikin. I'm in San Jose, California. I'm
> looking to eventually perform QA part-time for the open office
> project. I'm currently going through the Orientation modules.
> Regards,
>
> Andrew.
&g
Hi there,
My name is Andrew Chaikin. I'm in San Jose, California. I'm looking to
eventually perform QA part-time for the open office project. I'm currently
going through the Orientation modules.
Regards,
Andrew.
Hi All,
AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) have been closed on Aug 8, we
continue testing RC1 as wait for RC2, here is the weekly update (8/5 -
8/11):
*Test execution:*
We have assigned 176 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed
about 75.6% in execution (133 test executions d
Yu Zhen,
Thanks very much for the update!
I have run some test cases against RC1 on Win8, and updated the result in
testlink. So far every thing is good.
- Simon
2014-08-05 13:40 GMT+08:00 Yuzhen Fan :
> Hi All,
>
> We started doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25,
Hi All,
We started doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25,
and will close it before Aug 8. here is the bi-weekly update (7/21 - 8/4):
*Test execution:*
1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and
completed about 63.6% in execution (112 test execution
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
