[top posting -- update]
Damjan's r1708166 seems to have taken care of this, so YAY! back to
testing patches.
On 10/12/2015 09:20 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 10/11/2015 04:28 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 10 Oct, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> The FreeBSD buildbot and 1 Linux buildbot have also been getting this, yet
>>> 2 of us now couldn't reproduce it.
>>>
>>> Please provide:
>>> * SVN revision
>>> * full configure options
>>> * the compile log from earlier on (containing the command run that produces
>>> that error)
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Damjan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello --
>>>>
>>>> Currently, I am having problems building due to some recent changes in
>>>> sal/qa/osl/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sal/qa/osl/thread/test_thread.cxx seems to be successfully compiled but on
>>>> making qa_osl_thread, I am getting the following errors --
>>>>
>>>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsalcpprt
>>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../
>>>> unxlngi6.pro/bin/qa_osl_thread'
>>>>
>>>> Any help appreciated.
>>
>>
>> The FreeBSD buildbot seems to be happy now.
>>
>> I wonder if this an out of order build problem. In my last build I
>> see that the sal_ut_osl_pipe, sal_ut_osl_condition, and sal_ut_test
>> tests are all successfully run before the qa_osl_thread test, and all of
>> them use -lsalcpprt. If I'm intepreting man/sal/prj/build.lst
>> correctly, the first three of those are all specifying sa_cpprt.u as a
>> dependency:
>>
>> sa sal\qa\osl\pipe nmake - all sa_qa_osl_pipe sa_util sa_cpprt.u NULL
>> sa sal\qa\osl\condition nmake - all sa_qa_osl_condition sa_util sa_cpprt.u
>> NULL
>> sa sal\qa\sal nmake - all sa_qa_sal sa_util sa_cpprt.u NULL
>>
>> whereas qa_osl_thread does not:
>> sa sal\qa\osl\thread nmake - all sa_qa_osl_thread sa_util NULL
>>
>> I wonder if the failing builds are trying to run the thread test before
>> the libsalcpprt has been built?
>
> Hi Don --
>
> I spent some time looking into this yesterday. I think your analysis
> could be correct. I will investigate further today when I get a
> chance. I'm not sure why it's just seems to be affecting MY 32-bit
> Linux build however. :(
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------
MzK
“The journey of a thousand miles begins
with a single step.”
--Lao Tzu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
