Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-05 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/5/13 10:21 AM, janI wrote: > On 5 April 2013 09:16, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/4/13 9:22 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-05 Thread janI
On 5 April 2013 09:16, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/4/13 9:22 PM, janI wrote: > > On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a > lot > >>> of changes

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-05 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/4/13 9:22 PM, janI wrote: > On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot >>> of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in >>>

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 04/04/2013 05:21 PM, schrieb janI: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra manual work. Furthermore I would

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread janI
On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot > > of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in > > the l10n branch. This is a bad combin

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot > of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in > the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra > manual work. F

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot > of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in > the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra > manual work. Fu

[Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread janI
Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra manual work. Furthermore I would like the 4.0 language files to be clean