Thank you for your email, this is very helpul. I'm copying the open office
project team for their information.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: tensizes [mailto:tensi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 12:44 PM
To: d...@community.apache.org
Subject: Source signed by someone not on
versial changes in
>>> it.
>>>
>> That is NOT the point of a veto. A veto is "don't ship with that". The
>> corollary actions are very, very different from what you suggest.
>>
>
> Staying on the constructive part of this thread
On 27 December 2012 17:16, Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
>
> 2012/12/27 Ross Gardler
>
> > Yes Apache license is applicable to docs and presentations. If
> distributed
> > via the ASF then they should be Apache licensed.
> >
>
> And what about mu
Yes Apache license is applicable to docs and presentations. If distributed
via the ASF then they should be Apache licensed.
Ross
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 27 Dec 2012 04:59, "Peter Junge" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know if there's a common/best practice
> AOO running on it.
>
> Jan.
>
> On 14 December 2012 09:50, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
> > I use OO on a couple of windows 8 machines (one clean install, one
> upgrade
> > from Win 7). I've experienced no problems.
> >
> > Touch is a problem, as
I use OO on a couple of windows 8 machines (one clean install, one upgrade
from Win 7). I've experienced no problems.
Touch is a problem, as you would imagine it is for most apps designed for
Win7. One of the things MS applcations do is provide a "touch" mode. This
simply puts larger margins aroun
ike to use Google Moderator
> for any reason ?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Ross Gardler >wrote:
>
> > What a great idea. I'm copying this to the ComDev list so others can
> > consider it. Having said that this one reason this would work for AOO is
> &g
What a great idea. I'm copying this to the ComDev list so others can
consider it. Having said that this one reason this would work for AOO is
that it has such a large non-technical user community., something that's
not really true of other Apache projects.
If any projects adapt the idea please fee
Sent from my tablet
On Nov 10, 2012 8:03 PM, "Donald Harbison" wrote:
> On Saturday, November 10, 2012, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > I still think you are missing my point. I would like to know if AOO
> people
> > found the event useful in learning about the ASF, hence my
Rob Weir" wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
> > Sure, my point is that what people did do is not necessarily
> representative
> > of the value of the event and thus is not necessarily a good indicator of
> > best use of funds. Since
ion if you feel one is
> missing.
>
> -Rob
>
> On Nov 10, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
> > You missed how useful was it in learning about the ASF
> >
> > The problem is that the answers depend on how one approached the event.
> If
> > an
You missed how useful was it in learning about the ASF
The problem is that the answers depend on how one approached the event. If
an individual only attended the AOO track then one would not benefit from
the community track or other project specific tracks for example.
Ross
Sent from mobile, for
12 matches
Mail list logo
