I think we can only try to build and install on many distributions.
If it is only a folder change I think it should be save. At least Arch
/usr/lib is only a softlink to /usr/lib64
On 07.12.20 08:30, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear List,
I think I am close to a possible solution to this probl
Dear List,
I think I am close to a possible solution to this problem, that I will
propose as a pull request on GitHub once it will be ready.
I would like to make sure that Python and the pyuno modules are built
correctly and that they work as expected in my test builds. Can
someone please suggest
On 07.12.20 08:04, Don Lewis wrote:
On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello all,
I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with.
configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use
--disable-gtk or install the missing packages
What does this mean? I did not f
On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with.
>
> configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use
> --disable-gtk or install the missing packages
>
> What does this mean? I did not find this in any package.
>
Hi Mechtilde,
check main/saxton/saxton-9.0.0.7-bj.patch
line 147 and 148
+
+
all the best
Peter
On 07.12.20 07:48, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello,
Con someone give me a hint where and how can I change the source option
and the target option for the Java version.
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am
Hello all,
I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with.
configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use
--disable-gtk or install the missing packages
What does this mean? I did not find this in any package.
I installed gtk2 and gst-plugin-gtk (which are th
Hello,
Con someone give me a hint where and how can I change the source option
and the target option for the Java version.
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 06.12.20 um 13:57 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
> i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109
>
> I tried to do
Hi,
Am 06.12.20 um 16:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote:
The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone
Hi Jim,
Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone
>>> have the history and background on why we *require* that?
> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone
>> have the history and background on why we *require* that?
>
> Due to a bug in Java, Java7 & Java8 would not work
Hi,
Am 06.12.20 um 15:43 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
> No because I had enough trouble to remove the old epm version
> completely. I t takes three builds to be successful.
Why?!
>
> I don't want to have the same problem with a defect Java installation.
AdoptOpenJDK is not defect...
Matthias
>
Hello,
No because I had enough trouble to remove the old epm version
completely. I t takes three builds to be successful.
I don't want to have the same problem with a defect Java installation.
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 06.12.20 um 15:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 06.12.20 um 15:11 schrieb M
Am 06.12.20 um 15:11 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello Arrigo,
>
> thanks for your reply. as I mentioned, I have no machine to build the
> patch with gcc >= 7 and a Java version 8.x
>
> So I need help to fix the java problem before I can revies the fix
>
> Maybe another person on another system can review
Hello Arrigo,
thanks for your reply. as I mentioned, I have no machine to build the
patch with gcc >= 7 and a Java version 8.x
So I need help to fix the java problem before I can revies the fix
Maybe another person on another system can review it.
For me it isn't an opinion to create a further
Hello,
I am replying as I proposed PR #109.
thank you Mechtilde for your review.
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109
>
> I tried to do it under Debian 10.
>
> gcc 8.3
> java 11
>
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/110#issuecomment-739506019
Yes, but patches are normally committed top->down.
So first in trunk and then in the branches...
And there is no branch for a release yet, AOO42X is still for develo
Hello,
i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109
I tried to do it under Debian 10.
gcc 8.3
java 11
I didn't have a running system wizh gcc >=7 and Java 8
I get this error message
compile-bj:
/home/mechtilde/openoffice/main/saxon/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/src/b
You have two mailing lists in italian:
https://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html
- Mail original -
> De: "Eliodoro MIRANDA"
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Samedi 5 Décembre 2020 20:03:27
> Objet: Request of support for open office calc
>
> I am studyng now CALC but i need
NordMike commented on pull request #110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/110#issuecomment-739493620
It's for AOO42X because I'm trying to build upcoming release.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
On 2020/12/05 19:03:27, Eliodoro MIRANDA wrote:
> I am studyng now CALC but i need support.
> I have been searching in the web but I dont get the solution.
> I have found a forum also in italian but I don't succeed to register in it.
> Can you advise me.if there is a contact I can reach in It
20 matches
Mail list logo
