RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 14:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > Am 08/05/2016 10:43 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > > This is mainly a summary of opinions I've alrea

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > Am 08/05/2016 06:28 PM, schrieb D

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/5/2016 2:20 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 10:43 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: This is mainly a summary of opinions I've already expressed on security@. The discussion does not actually involve anything that needs to be confidential, so it should be taking place on dev@ instead. This i

expat upgrade patch needs testing

I just submitted a patch to upgrade the bundled expat to version 2.2.0: I've done some testing on FreeBSD and Windows. Unfortunately I can't test Linux at the moment. After a Virtualbox upgrade, both of my Linux VMs panic the host system when I

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On 08/05/2016 12:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: For tracking the [TESTING] of the 4.1.2-patch1 binary for windows, I have created task Issue 127065, . Comment 7 there already speaks to the untrusted identification situation. I am adding an a

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Hi Marcus, Until AOO can provide a simple auto-update that includes patches then from a user perspective Patricia is completely correct. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 08/05/2016 10:43 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >> This is mainly a su

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/05/2016 10:43 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: This is mainly a summary of opinions I've already expressed on security@. The discussion does not actually involve anything that needs to be confidential, so it should be taking place on dev@ instead. This is controversial - I expect replies dis

Planning for emergency releases

This is mainly a summary of opinions I've already expressed on security@. The discussion does not actually involve anything that needs to be confidential, so it should be taking place on dev@ instead. This is controversial - I expect replies disagreeing with my views. The point of this thread is

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

Am 08/03/2016 04:48 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on the approval of the candidate for release. [ ] +1 Approve, with description [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation +1 Approve For +1 Approve votes, please describe the

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/05/2016 07:02 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 09:36 To: OOo Apache; Dennis Hamilton Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 f

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/05/2016 12:30 PM, schrieb Carl Marcum: On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The fi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/05/2016 06:28 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applyi

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 09:36 > To: OOo Apache ; Dennis Hamilton > > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at

[PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > A

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 > [TESTING]. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

For tracking the [TESTING] of the 4.1.2-patch1 binary for windows, I have created task Issue 127065, . Comment 7 there already speaks to the untrusted identification situation. I am adding an abridged version of this message from Carl with the p

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at