Agree with Rob and Andrea that the pages serve a purpose.
My reason for filing the original bug was simply that during translation into
Norwegian,
I saw several pages were outdated, talking about MSO 2003 EOL etc.
Instead of discussing details of wording here, why don’t someone who cares for
the
The "Why" page is important and shouldn't be discarded.
The advantages over MS Office are obvious...
It is far less obvious how AOO is currently better than LO / Gnome Office /
Calligra Suite.
The references to scientific papers in Gnumeric home page are a good
example for a convincing "Why" page.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I am +1 for also looking at the why_new_computers page as Jan suggests.
>
> Telling people that AOO is free is not the issue.
>
> Where it is an advantage is a matter for users to decide. We should let them
> judge for themselves.
>
I
> From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com]
> > Is it possible reset the feedback on 4.x compatibility the extension
> > directory?
> >
>
> Sure, done.
Fine. Thank you.
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
2016-01-09 20:25 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schmidt :
> Hello,
>
> After over a year testing, i have today released Basic Addon Builder
> 0.5.2, see:
>
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/basicaddonbuilder-extensions-packager#releases
>
> This version is compatible with AOO 4.0 and later versions.
>
2016-01-09 20:40 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schmidt :
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible reset the feedback on 4.x compatibility the extension
> directory?
>
Sure, done.
Roberto
>
> What is the problem?
> For Basic Addon Builder voted on compatibility, as no compatible version
> was published, so the vote is rat
Am 01/09/2016 11:57 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 01/08/2016 12:05 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
By the way, Marcus, while you
are at it, we also have a eu-test to eu transition ready (see l10n
list).
OK, haven't seen this so far.
Seeing that the "eu" one was just a svn mv, I
