On 14 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 Don Lewis wrote:
>> Looks like you are compiling with gcc 4.9. I ran into this same problem
>> on FreeBSD and worked around it by changing the "-Os" optimization flag
>> ... This is a gcc bug, see:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65
Hello,
I want to change my entry on the reference list (old company) - can you
please tell me, who I have to contact for this matter?
Thank you in advance and best regards, David
FWIW, that patch did indeed fix the build error I was seeing, so I endorse
the idea of going ahead and merging that.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 20/08/2015 Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>
>> I ran into this bug:
>
As me from my soapbox:
Any proposal for reworking trademark policies would naturally "grandfather"
prior arrangements. My hope is that any rework of policies would be more and
not less generous than current reality.
I think that the project should have an open source code test for Powered By
t
Hmm, I guess it has been a long day.
Read:
"... in the same manner as the OpenOffice software that people obtain to use
directly."
Read:
"Distributing a modified version of the software must not be done in a manner
that infringes those trademarks.
[;<), Dennis
-Original Message-
All of the source code used in making an Apache OpenOffice distribution is
available free to the public, in the same manner as the OpenOffice software the
people directly.
The code can be downloaded, modified (or not) and used to build the programs.
The use of that code is governed by the Apac
>From the Chair,
I don't know, off-hand, what the proportion of discussion of Trademark Policy
is in the PMC private discussion activity so far this year.
However, a discussion of trademark policy, as such, especially with "real and
fictional examples," is inappropriate on this list if it is ab
Dear Sir or Madam,
If anyone who knows programming, can modify and change Open Office, how do you
maintain control & quality? Or are they only aloud to modify or change a copy
of their Open Office that they downloaded?
Thank You,
Adrian
On 20/08/2015 Phillip Rhodes wrote:
I ran into this bug:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126258
I just applied the patch in the bug, trying the build again now.
Thank you for bringing it to the list's attention anyway (and thanks
Alexander for contributing the patch in the first plac
Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126258: javadoc fails to build
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126258
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Pescetti ---
I suggest that we include this patch in 4.1.2:
- One-line patch
- Fixes a build problem when using a recent versio
On Aug 29, 2015 14:02, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
> I have no means to produce comparisons with other projects and it is out
of scope for me here. Maybe other projects might undertake it just to
satisfy themselves that their activity is as confined as it is thought to
be.
>
Or, pos
We could reduce private traffic if we discussed the policy for trademarks in
public. The community can help write a clear policy statement with real and
fictional examples. This would serve the community by reducing private
inquiries to unusual cases not previously considered or unclearly explai
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Separating out [VOTE] and maybe even [DISCUSS] threads related to
[VOTE]s and/or lazy consensus should be possible. I will look into
that as a refinement in future reports.
I would save you some hours and rely on easy indicators and on a clear
goal: full transparency
Good idea, Phil
Separating out [VOTE] and maybe even [DISCUSS] threads related to [VOTE]s
and/or lazy consensus should be possible. I will look into that as a
refinement in future reports. (It will also be helpful if the practices for
tagging mail threads are followed consistently.)
It shoul
On Aug 29, 2015 12:21, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/29/15 8:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
>
> I would discourage any reasoning based on aggregate message counts.
> Every +1 on a PMC member VOTE counts as a message, for example. Th
Keith N. McKenna has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 120706: CRASH - navigating tables containing NULL timestamps in
DataSourceBrowser using mysql JDBC connector causes AOO to crash
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120706
--- Comment #6 from Keith N. McKenna ---
As this issue
On 8/29/15 8:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
I would discourage any reasoning based on aggregate message counts.
Every +1 on a PMC member VOTE counts as a message, for example. The
thing to look carefully at is what is being discussed o
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
On Aug 29, 2015 02:42, "Marcus" wrote:
> In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
>
> I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is currently
> and that there is an urgent need to turn down
Am 08/28/2015 06:07 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely
built with cppunit for a while, which means our unit test
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
>> Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely
>> built with cppunit for a while, whi
Hi All,
this is something of a self promotion but I have a tool that is
intended to be of use to ODF developers and testers.
It is available via GitHub see http://hammyau.github.io/ODFExplorer/
for some details.
Thanks for you time.
Any and all feedback welcome.
Ian C
21 matches
Mail list logo
