On 29/04/15 21:53, Marcus wrote:
> Am 04/29/2015 05:39 PM, schrieb jan i:
>> On 29 April 2015 at 15:07, Simon Phipps wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>>> wrote:
>>>
Simon Phipps wrote:
> Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the
On 29/04/15 13:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> issue would not justify it. As far as I know, there are no known
> exploits and we are talking about a file format that is obsolete by all
Is this vulnerability exploited only by opening a file in HWP format, or
can it be exploited by any file?
jonatho
On 17/03/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
The #2 from the list seems critical to everything else.
2) Internal reorganization: people say what they are going to
do to drive the project forward (so an "active" approach
rather than the "I don't have time, but someone should..."
Am 04/29/2015 05:39 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 29 April 2015 at 15:07, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the
project
suspend downloads until it can be addressed?
This
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 29/04/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> put it into external/unowinreg using your browser or a command
>> equivalent to:
>> wget -O external/unowinreg/unowinreg.dll
>> http://www.openoffice.org/tools/unowinreg_prebuild/68
On 29 April 2015 at 15:07, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
>
> > Simon Phipps wrote:
> >
> >> Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the
> >> project
> >> suspend downloads until it can be addressed?
> >>
> >
> > This looks
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the
>> project
>> suspend downloads until it can be addressed?
>>
>
> This looks like a very extreme measure to take. The severity of the issue
> woul
Simon Phipps wrote:
Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the project
suspend downloads until it can be addressed?
This looks like a very extreme measure to take. The severity of the
issue would not justify it. As far as I know, there are no known
exploits and we are
Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the project
suspend downloads until it can be addressed? Few of the people downloading
the package will be aware of this CVE or of the necessary mitigation
post-install.
S.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> C
>The server at 10.5.101.1 is taking too long to respond.
This @ IP is in a private network.
That meaning that it is not allocated to any specific organization and cannot
be transmitted through the public Internet.
-
To unsubscri
On 29/04/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
put it into external/unowinreg using your browser or a command
equivalent to:
wget -O external/unowinreg/unowinreg.dll
http://www.openoffice.org/tools/unowinreg_prebuild/680/unowinreg.dll
Is this really needed for Linux builds of the ODK?
I wr
On 28/04/2015 Marcus wrote:
Am 04/28/2015 06:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
As we plan for the 4.1.2 release, should we give some thought to the
importance of the HWP filter, Hangul Word Processor
But Jeongkyu Kim on the L10n@ mailing list wrote that it is no longer
relevant. So, maybe time to dele
12 matches
Mail list logo
