About ant

Hi there. This is my first time to build OOo. When I run the command $ ./configure--with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/ant"--with-dmake-url="http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2"--with-epm-url="http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz"--enable-pch--disa

Re: OOXML

On 08/03/2014 12:50 PM, Peter Kelly wrote: On 3 Aug 2014, at 6:52 pm, Regina Henschel > wrote: The second option has the advantage that it would be easier to cater for features that are supported in OOXML but not ODF, e.g. table styles. However the first option

Spam in the extension repository!

Hi, Kindly notified on the EN forum, 2 extensions that are in fact spam: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/service-daccompagnement-instantane http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/instant-coaching-service Anybody who can remove them? Hagar --

RE: OOXML

In a later note, Jan asks about my statement concerning digital signatures, private content, and covert content: "In the other mail you write a quite interesting note about digital signing of artifact the user cannot see. Do you happen to know how microsoft goes around that with the web

Re: OOXML

On 3 August 2014 19:56, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Below, Jan asks > > “Does a consumer normally have some sort of conformance sheet > (like we have for communication protocols) or is it solely the user > that painfully finds the lack of support ?” > > I think this is easy to answer.

RE: OOXML

Below, Jan asks “Does a consumer normally have some sort of conformance sheet (like we have for communication protocols) or is it solely the user that painfully finds the lack of support ?” I think this is easy to answer. Where have you found an ODF conformance sheet for Apache Open

Re: OOXML

On 3 August 2014 18:50, Peter Kelly wrote: > On 3 Aug 2014, at 6:52 pm, Regina Henschel > wrote: > > Peter Kelly schrieb: > > There's two ways to view a format: (1) as a way of encoding information > for storage or transmission, and (2) as an in-memory data structure used > by the editor at runt

Re: OOXML

On 3 Aug 2014, at 6:52 pm, Regina Henschel wrote: > Peter Kelly schrieb: >> There's two ways to view a format: (1) as a way of encoding information >> for storage or transmission, and (2) as an in-memory data structure used >> by the editor at runtime. In some programs these are two different >>

Re: native-lang.html suggestions now in staging...

On 07/30/2014 02:00 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/30/2014 10:50 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> >> On 07/30/2014 01:44 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>> Am 07/30/2014 08:51 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 07/30/2014 11:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/28/2014 09:43 PM, schrieb Marcus (O

Change tracking & versioning (was Re: OOXML)

On 3 Aug 2014, at 3:05 am, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > In line with the sketch that Peter Kelley provides below, I am personally > very sympathetic to the idea of having an internal model that can tolerate > difference in format between input and output while preserving in the output > everyth

Re: OOXML

Hi Peter, Peter Kelly schrieb: On 3 Aug 2014, at 1:57 am, jan i mailto:j...@apache.org>> wrote: I too am on peter fast rolling waggon :-) but I am also confused. @peter maybe you could explain a couple of things, for non-document specialists: 1) Following your thought, with biderectional edi

Re: OOXML

On 3 Aug 2014, at 3:05 am, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > In line with the sketch that Peter Kelley provides below, I am personally > very sympathetic to the idea of having an internal model that can tolerate > difference in format between input and output while preserving in the output > everyth

Re: OOXML

On 3 Aug 2014, at 1:57 am, jan i wrote: > I too am on peter fast rolling waggon :-) but I am also confused. > > @peter maybe you could explain a couple of things, for non-document > specialists: > > 1) Following your thought, with biderectional editors. Why would a editor > have a home format ?

Re: OOXML

On 2 August 2014 22:31, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Below, Jan asks > > "Does the standard contain some rules about keeping private information > ?" > > There are two cases for ODF 1.2. > > First there is the case for foreign elements/attributes/attribute values. > This would be the case for s