On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:17 AM, wrote:
> my spell check doesn't work, am I supposed to download a dictionary?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Windows Mail
Please try the steps in the spell check troubleshooting tutorial on the
user forum
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=16512
Y
On 6 March 2014 00:03, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> The ApacheCon Denver Schedule has been published. Some of the talks
>> relevant to OpenOffice are at
>> http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/overview/type/openoffice
>> and there are more in the "commu
On 02/03/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The ApacheCon Denver Schedule has been published. Some of the talks
relevant to OpenOffice are at
http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/overview/type/openoffice
and there are more in the "community" tracks.
Quick update:
- If you are considering to att
On 04/03/2014 Daniel Roberts wrote:
To complete this upgrade process we need to understand the
compatibility of the software supplied by yourselves. To assist with
this, we have detailed the tables below
Dear Daniel,
OpenOffice is developed by volunteers, so we are not a "traditional"
software
Am 03/05/2014 05:23 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I
would
like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target
Am 03/05/2014 09:37 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 3/3/14 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
of course this is a showstopper, means we will definitely make a new build.
to keep you all informed the upload of the rebuild Beta RC is ongoing
and we expect to have all the bits in place later tonight.
Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify
some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to
prepare webpages:
3. File
On 5 March 2014 20:47, Rob Weir wrote:
> If you look at the SourceForge page you'll see that shows 99.7 million
> downloads:
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline?dates=2011-11-29+to+2014-03-18
>
> But that number includes the downloads of Language Packs.
If you look at the SourceForge page you'll see that shows 99.7 million
downloads:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline?dates=2011-11-29+to+2014-03-18
But that number includes the downloads of Language Packs. The more
conservative number that we report on the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I would
>>> like to propose
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 05.03.2014 14:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>
>>> propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
>>> Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
my spell check doesn't work, am I supposed to download a dictionary?
Sent from Windows Mail
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I would
like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'. Something
like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used f
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 14:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
won't be part of the AOO 4.1.0 release
Good idea. I would actually use it also for i
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:23 AM, FR web forum wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I would to update some outdated pages from french website:
> http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Mac/
> I don't find it on SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/fr
>
Is this it here:
https://svn.apa
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I would
> like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'. Something
> like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which won't be
Hello list,
I would to update some outdated pages from french website:
http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Mac/
I don't find it on SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/fr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
On 05.03.2014 14:18, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i wrote:
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
I wouldn't like to turn off th
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
won't be part of the AOO 4.1.0 release
Good idea. I would actually use it also for issues that are not solved
yet but that we agree t
On 05.03.2014 14:49, jan i wrote:
On 5 March 2014 14:42, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions
enabled.
That sounds reasonable.
Does anyone know
On 5 March 2014 14:42, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>
>> On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>>re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions
>>> enabled.
>>>
>>
>> That sounds reasonable.
>>
>> Does anyone know of a reason
On 05.03.2014 11:53, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 11:45, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning "expression has no effect" itself is interesting enough,
just not in in
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions
enabled.
That sounds reasonable.
Does anyone know of a reason not to do that?
Not that I'm aware of.
I am neither, that's why I ask
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I
would like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
won't be part of the AOO 4.1.0 release, but be part of the next
following on
On 05.03.2014 14:20, jan i wrote:
On 5 March 2014 14:18, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i wrote:
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11
On 5 March 2014 14:18, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i wrote:
> > On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer wrote:
> >
> >> On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
> >>> wntmsci11.mk...
> >
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>> On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
>>> wntmsci11.mk...
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't like to turn off this warning globall
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
>> wntmsci11.mk...
>>
>
> I wouldn't like to turn off this warning globally. I only don't want to
> see it for system headers tha
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
I wouldn't like to turn off this warning globally. I only don't want to
see it for system headers that I can't change anyway.
-Andre
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
On 5 Mar 2014 08:31, "Andre Fischer" wrote:
> I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
> really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning messages.
> Some of thes
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it
is really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc
but the majority of the warnings originate in hea
On 05.03.2014 11:45, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning "expression has no effect" itself is interesting enough,
just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like "list(
On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning "expression has no effect" itself is interesting enough,
just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like "list(1137)" can be
filtered out easily.
Please
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning "expression has no effect" itself is interesting enough,
just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like "list(1137)" can be
filtered out easily.
Please explain how that can be filtered out easil
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but
the
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but
the majority of the warnings originate in heade
On 3/3/14 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> of course this is a showstopper, means we will definitely make a new build.
to keep you all informed the upload of the rebuild Beta RC is ongoing
and we expect to have all the bits in place later tonight. We will
inform you...
I plan to start the vote
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but
the majority of the warnings originate in header files. Platform is
Windows. The most
39 matches
Mail list logo
