On 5 March 2014 14:42, Andre Fischer <awf....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote: > >> On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions >>> enabled. >>> >> >> That sounds reasonable. >> >> Does anyone know of a reason not to do that? >>> >> >> Not that I'm aware of. >> > > I am neither, that's why I ask :-) > > Exception support does make object files larger and possibly a bit slower. > The question is, is that significant? Module sw nowadays has exception > support for all its files. And not changing at least the files in sc/ for > which there are warnings might lead to memory leaks when there are > exceptions. So it is probably best to activate support for exceptions > module wide. >
On ubuntu, the "slower" is not measureable. It is basically to extra function calls, and a word extra on heap, I assume it is identical on windows. On ubuntu object files seems to be 5-10% bigger, but the final exe (I use this in e.g. genLang) in my case is less than 1% bigger. I had problems with exceptions in modules where java is called (just a warning). rgds jan I. > -Andre > Herbert > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
