On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM Filipe Cavalcanti wrote:
> Hi there!
> I think having tests under `testing/` is good if it mirrors the directory
> structure of the OS.
> `testing/sched/clock`: sched/clock specific tests
> `testing/mm/iob`: mm/IOB specific tests
> `testing/sched/signal`: signal test
Hello world :-)
There is a interesting PR to move and group existing
nuttx-apps/testing tests into directories by feature:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2931
As I understand this is not about test rewrite just reorganization at
this point. We are discussing the feature names where te
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 4:00 AM Yanfeng Liu wrote:
> Tiago,
> Thank you and Congratulations!
> Regarding the following paragraph:
> > One can argue that Python wasn’t designed to run on resource-constrained
> devices - like the ones that are supported by the NuttX RTOS - and that there
> are other a
Hi there!
I think having tests under `testing/` is good if it mirrors the directory
structure of the OS.
`testing/sched/clock`: sched/clock specific tests
`testing/mm/iob`: mm/IOB specific tests
`testing/sched/signal`: signal tests
Seems the PR you mentioned goes towards this idea, but I unders
> Exactly :-) There are more and more powerful chips out there with Cortex-A
> CPU or big RISC-V one day we may outperform big OS with NuttX on them :-)
Those "BIG OSes" perform a different function than an RTOS. The big OS is not
an RTOS and does not have real-time performance. Their default
