RE: Re: Reevaluate the C89 Requirement

2022-08-29 Thread Alan Rosenthal
Hi! What needs to be done to open the discussion to consider changing the rules? Also please see a very detailed comment on the github issue here by @robertlipe: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896#issuecomment-1227971503 Thanks, Alan On 2022/08/25 07:07:43 Byron Ellacott wr

Re: Re: Reevaluate the C89 Requirement

2022-08-29 Thread Gregory Nutt
You would probably need to motivate a member of the PPMC to host a vote. No one person should make a decision like this. A vote confirms the will of the majority of the PPMC. For the case of code modifications, there are special voting rules that apply: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.h

Re: Re: Reevaluate the C89 Requirement

2022-08-29 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 7:54 PM Alan Rosenthal wrote: > Hi! > > What needs to be done to open the discussion to consider changing the > rules? > > Also please see a very detailed comment on the github issue here by > @robertlipe: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896#issuecommen

Re: Re: Reevaluate the C89 Requirement

2022-08-29 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:18 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > Just my thoughts... I'll be glad to hear the thoughts of others. I can understand both sides.. and that this is quite a large architectural change that would impact both compatibility and workload.. maybe a clear list of pros (+1) and cons (-