Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-10-31 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Everyone, The move to the Kconfig is finally happening and we would have the chance to make suggestions. Please take a look in the discussion here: https://github.com/lvgl/lvgl/pull/1875 Thank you Abdelatif for let me know about it, I didn't see the github notification. BR, Alan On 8/25/2

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-10-31 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
It's nice to revive this discussion. As I was saying in Github, I don't see a "not too awkward" way to include the Kconfig file directly and use it as any Kconfig we have. BTW, is LVGL going to provide a script to convert the Kconfig to a lv_config.h of some sort? If that's the case we'll only h

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-10-31 Thread Matias N.
But isn't the point that we would just source their Kconfig? What I mentioned previously is that maybe it can be done so that they can accept an external header providing the Kconfig defitions (in our case nuttx/config.h). Or maybe I'm missing something... On Sat, Oct 31, 2020, at 20:27, Abdelati

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-10-31 Thread Brennan Ashton
I'm confused how this would work. Don't you need to download the source tarball which is controlled via kconfig before you could source it? Every other system I have used that does this has you supply the defconfig to the top level build system. It you want to change settings you would do make lvg