But isn't the point that we would just source their Kconfig? What I mentioned previously is that maybe it can be done so that they can accept an external header providing the Kconfig defitions (in our case nuttx/config.h).
Or maybe I'm missing something... On Sat, Oct 31, 2020, at 20:27, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > It's nice to revive this discussion. > > As I was saying in Github, I don't see a "not too awkward" way to > include the Kconfig file directly and use it as any Kconfig we have. > > BTW, is LVGL going to provide a script to convert the Kconfig to a > lv_config.h of some sort? If that's the case we'll only have to call > the script after we download the tarball. > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 4:38 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis > <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > The move to the Kconfig is finally happening and we would have the > > chance to make suggestions. > > > > Please take a look in the discussion here: > > > > https://github.com/lvgl/lvgl/pull/1875 > > > > Thank you Abdelatif for let me know about it, I didn't see the github > > notification. > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On 8/25/20, Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > Mr. Gábor Kiss-Vámosi contacted and told me that LVGL is moving to use > > > Kconfig: > > > > > > "At LVGL we are planning to add a Kconfig file to the main repo but we > > > are not sure if it will harm the existing Kconfig based projects. > > > > > > Could you comment on what your requirements are and what we should > > > consider in order to allow NuttX to use LVGL's Kcofig file or - if > > > it's not possible - to make sure it won't bother your Kconfig file?" > > > > > > So, I think this is a good opportunity to make NuttX more integrated > > > with LVGL. Suggestions are welcome. > > > > > > Gábor, I added you CC here because I don't know if you are subscribed > > > to NuttX at Apache Foundation mailing list. > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > Alan > > > >
