Yes, if we can merge both in a single dd command, but keep the
configuration to have a small dd (like that from nshlib) for small
microcontroller as Sebastien suggested, it will be fine.
+1
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:59 AM Xiang Xiao
wrote:
> The functionality in system/dd and nshlib is unsync,
+1
The duplication of the same features in the system is a nuisance to
developers,
who do not understand which version to use or which version has more
advantages.
In addition, removing redundancy also helps optimize the usage of flash/ram.
BRs,
Tomek CEDRO 于2025年4月14日周一 22:18写道：
> Thanks Xiang
Thanks Xiang for the details :-)
Why not add the unsync to the nsh/dd and keep this one still as
minimal default with more features delectable instead removing? :-)
Aside question did NuttX consider `/bin/dd` versus built-in `dd`
(something like built-in `time` versus `/usr/bin/time` in Unix)? We
Great, thanks for the precision.
I still wonder about the increased flash use but it is still possible to
improve that later.
+1
Sebastien
On 14/04/2025 15:58, Xiang Xiao wrote:
The functionality in system/dd and nshlib is unsync, this patch:
1. update system/dd to get the same functio
The functionality in system/dd and nshlib is unsync, this patch:
1. update system/dd to get the same functionality as nshlib/dd
2. remove one copy(nshlib/dd) to avoid the inconsistency in the future.
Good work! thanks.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:07 PM 董九柱 wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> I
+1
Best
Alin
Från: Lee, Lup Yuen
Skickat: den 14 april 2025 15:53
Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Ämne: Re: Vote for using system dd instead of nsh dd, avoid duplicate code
+1 Hi Donny: Please remember to close the voting in 72 hours. Thanks :-) Lup On
Mon, Apr 14
+1
Hi Donny: Please remember to close the voting in 72 hours. Thanks :-)
Lup
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:07 PM 董九柱 wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> I submit some PRs about using system/dd app instead of dd command from
> nshlib.
>
> PR link:
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3057
> https:
Hello
1 - code duplication has never been rejected in nuttx
2 - it hurts no one since each of them can be selected individually.
My vote: Do nothing unless you actually justify the real life problem
you're facing that requires this.
Ideally: -1 because that's just cosmetics.
But I know you
Hello Community,
I submit some PRs about using system/dd app instead of dd command from
nshlib.
PR link:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3057
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16198
Why do?
There are two implementations of dd in the current system, one under nshlib
and the other und
