I had been confused earlier and thought that we were talking about the
buildroot repo.
The NuttX buildroot only shares the name with the "real" buildroot
because it leveraged from it. It is a completely incompatible,
unrelated thing now (but still have the roots and the name).
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:37 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> On 3/9/2020 3:33 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
> I understand that there have been exceptions made for Apache
> projects to
> allow GPL support tools into Apache project. I would not have any
> difficulty granting those repositori
On 3/9/2020 3:33 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
I understand that there have been exceptions made for Apache
projects to
allow GPL support tools into Apache project. I would not have any
difficulty granting those repositories to the project. But I cannot
comfortably use the github NuttX repositor
I understand that there have been exceptions made for Apache
projects to
allow GPL support tools into Apache project. I would not have any
difficulty granting those repositories to the project. But I cannot
comfortably use the github NuttX repository.
The GPL projects no longer exist. I
I understand that there have been exceptions made for Apache projects to
allow GPL support tools into Apache project. I would not have any
difficulty granting those repositories to the project. But I cannot
comfortably use the github NuttX repository.
The GPL projects no longer exist. I ke
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:00 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> >> Should (or shouldn't) this become an official part of the Apache NuttX
> >> project? I don't think anything stops anyone from hosting a mirror
> >> anywhere they wish.
> >
> > It can't because it contains GPL code. My concern is that with no
Should (or shouldn't) this become an official part of the Apache NuttX
project? I don't think anything stops anyone from hosting a mirror
anywhere they wish.
It can't because it contains GPL code. My concern is that with no
project organization to manage it, I do not want to put the master i
Should (or shouldn't) this become an official part of the Apache NuttX
project? I don't think anything stops anyone from hosting a mirror
anywhere they wish.
It can't because it contains GPL code. My concern is that with no
project organization to manage it, I do not want to put the master i
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:54 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> >> I maintain only the Bitbucket tool repository.
> >>
> > Greg, can we migrate the bitucket tool to https://github.com/nuttx?
>
> No, I am going to keep my repositories on Bitbucket.
Should (or shouldn't) this become an official part of the A
I maintain only the Bitbucket tool repository.
Greg, can we migrate the bitucket tool to https://github.com/nuttx?
No, I am going to keep my repositories on Bitbucket.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 5:51 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> I maintain only the Bitbucket tool repository.
>
Greg, can we migrate the bitucket tool to https://github.com/nuttx?
The benefit is that:
1.The end user can get all stuff from a single website
2.All contributor can use the same workflow for b
That's right. I'll make PR to use Bitbucket tool repository.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年3月8日周日 上午5:51写道：
> I maintain only the Bitbucket tool repository.
>
> On 3/7/2020 4:44 PM, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote:
> > Haitao, thank you for your hard work , and thanks to everyone who
> > helped push this forwar
Abdelatif Guettouche 于2020年3月8日周日 上午5:49写道：
> Haitao, thank you for your hard work , and thanks to everyone who
> helped push this forward.
>
> I noticed one small thing. The cibuild.sh script uses the tools
> repository from Github, I believe the one in Bitbucket is more recent.
> I don't know w
I maintain only the Bitbucket tool repository.
On 3/7/2020 4:44 PM, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote:
Haitao, thank you for your hard work , and thanks to everyone who
helped push this forward.
I noticed one small thing. The cibuild.sh script uses the tools
repository from Github, I believe the one i
Haitao, thank you for your hard work , and thanks to everyone who
helped push this forward.
I noticed one small thing. The cibuild.sh script uses the tools
repository from Github, I believe the one in Bitbucket is more recent.
I don't know which one we should continue to support and update, but I
With efforts and reviews from community, the nuttx and apps github action
pull request check build CI now take effect.
To summarize, Github action CI workflow steps as below:
a. Pull docker container with build essential tools preinstalled
b. Clone nuttx, apps and testing repos
c. Do check job:
16 matches
Mail list logo
